Hi,   I am aware Autodesk is trying to find an optimal way to create a link between RSA and Revit for years. Analytical model creation in Revit nearly always causes accuracy issues due to misaligned nodes/members and FEM simplification.    My opinion on this, why we can't directly export / transfer a 3D solid model of the Revit physical model to RSA for analysis? It should be %100 accurate and there is no need for conversion. RSA has 3D solid model mesh creation and solvers already. 3D solid analysis will be much more realistic due to less simplification and current PCs have much more capable than previous generations. RSA can use AMD/NVIDIA GPUs for computation with updates.    Kindly consider analytical model creation roadmap again. There is no suffice solution for years maybe converting Revit physical model directly to 3D solid with material specs will be much easier and more efficient. This can be done by RSA by directly meshing the Revit physical model and solve it. Why need analytical automation or conversion?  That method is not feasible for most of the time.    Thanks  Show More

Hi,   I am aware Autodesk is trying to find an optimal way to create a link between RSA and Revit for years. Analytical model creation in Revit nearly always causes accuracy issues due to misaligned nodes/members and FEM simplification.    My opinion on this, why we can't directly export / transfer a 3D solid model of the Revit physical model to RSA for analysis? It should be %100 accurate and there is no need for conversion. RSA has 3D solid model mesh creation and solvers already. 3D solid analysis will be much more realistic due to less simplification and current PCs have much more capable than previous generations. RSA can use AMD/NVIDIA GPUs for computation with updates.    Kindly consider analytical model creation roadmap again. There is no suffice solution for years maybe converting Revit physical model directly to 3D solid with material specs will be much easier and more efficient. This can be done by RSA by directly meshing the Revit physical model and solve it. Why need analytical automation or conversion?  That method is not feasible for most of the time.    Thanks  Show More

Please add the NTC 2018 Italian code in the software. Most of the clients are asking the design based on the NTC 2018 code, which will be helpful to the Robot Structural Analysis software users. Show More

In order to have correct and usable results in the non-linear calculation of cases of pseudostatic forces, I propose to give the user the possibility to choose to assign the sign of a pseudostatic case to the results of the quadratic combination (in the same way as the seismic quadratic calculation). Having a sign for the quadratic results will help to have a correct result for compression and traction in the walls and for constraints in the foundation.   Thanks in advance. Nader ASSAF. Show More

Hello,   Wind simulation is a fantastic addition to RSA, but it needs improvements. We need to see traces and planes results like on the Autodesk CFD and also, we need XYZ wind tunnel not just XY. For e.g. I cannot calculate uplift force from the wind for a balcony.    Thanks  Show More

Allowing geometry, supports, load conditions etc to be handled in small CSV files would be a major help allowing model definition and editing in Excel. Show More

Hi,   Please allow users to add grids and dimensions to section definition. It is really hard to design a custom section without reference lines and added dimensions for controlling it after design.    Please also change the colour theme of the section definition and match it with regular geometry view theme. It is really hard to see yellow guide / lines on blue surface when I am on the section definition tool.    Thanks  Show More

Hello,   Please provide an option for exporting RC element rebars to 3D DWG. It is very useful to see them in Robot but cannot use those 3D rebar shapes in any other software.  Show More

Please provide an option for exporting calculated provided rebars to Revit. I calculated all rebars using robot but cannot export them to revit.  Show More

Hi,   PLOEDIT hasn't been updated for years and it is a dinosaur module. Please update PLOEDIT for a more intuitive drawing module like AutoCAD like UI and UX.   Show More

Hello, I have noticed that it is impossible de switch from one version of RSA to another without going through a certain procedure shown below.  This procedure is not required when using for example AutoCAD or REVIT which is great.   Is there a way of avoiding this message because one cannot help having to reopen past models for consultation from time to time ? Furthermore, the precedure that is lauched requires a certain level of IT security clearance which is not always available depending on company policies.   Thanks in advance.   Kind regards,   Show More

  Good morning, the RSAP eccentricities are not detected when the model could be prepared for transfer to "advance steel" adjust the bare exterior of the columns or roof crosspieces Show More

We cannot use RC wall design and reinforcement detailing using BS-EN 1992-1-1:2004 NA:2005.    Kindly add RC wall design option using BS-EN 1992-1-1:2004 NA:2005.      Show More

There is no option for RC wall - deep beam provided reinforcement option like on the ACI-318 or French Code. I think this option will be a great addition to Eurocode users.  Show More

Global, local, section cut axis are all referred to as the X,Y,Z axis. A cursory review of the forum posting reveals significant confusion with what axis results are displayed in.    I would suggest that all references, GUI labels, etc. be revised to explicit declarations of axis following a similar convention to below: Global - X, Y, Z Local - XX, YY, ZZ Principal - 1, 2, 3 Arbitrary - a, b, c   As an example this would result in the following change to the "Diagrams for Members" interface: in this way there can be no confusion about what axis results are being displayed Show More

seismic building analysis based on Eurocode 8 story mass differ note properly calculated on RSAPRO but Etabs calculate properly what is my mistake I done?   Show More