Wrong concomitants in table

[gliga]

Dear All,

after using ROBOT for years a realized that concomitants in table of extreme forces are not correct (at least in version 2016 and at least for "ULS Code Combination).

This is my favorite way for data presentation (the shortest and with a lot of informations).

Also, I have a lot of EXCEL files that use this kind of table.

Am I in fallacy or this is a bug.

I must say that concomitants should mean APPROPRIATE OTHER FORCES FOR PARTICULAR EXTREME - FOR SAME BAR, SAME SECTION AND SAME LOAD CASE.

In general various number of concomitants are wrong, I could not figure out the rule.

Here is the example for only one wrong concomitant

Sincerely,

User (scared)

[Artur.Kosakowski]

Could you attach this model? Thank you.

[gliga]

Model is here

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20766887/Euromodul_Rev8-Copy.zip

In model I investigate profiles made with "section definition" as "thin walled" (could this be a reason?) - so I do not know if you will be able to see them (do not know is such profiles are in model or not). If you are not able to see profiles tell me what else I have to attach.

Here are one particulary example (more drastic) what I am talking about.

Diagnose please,

User

[Artur.Kosakowski]

Thank you. We will look at this situation. For a moment use for each objects instead of for all objects option. 

[Artur.Kosakowski · Accepted solution]

Corrected in SP4 for RSA 2016.

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

[gliga]

Thank you.
Do you, maybe, know from witch version is this bug, or exist "from the beginning"?
Gliga