Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Slab on grade - lack of convergence for soil with uplift

7 REPLIES 7
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 8
Anonymous
1068 Views, 7 Replies

Slab on grade - lack of convergence for soil with uplift

Hi,

 

I'm calculating a slab on grade. Although it has just compression loads, calculation doesn't  converge. I think it has no sense. What is wrong?

 

Thanks.

 

@Anonymous Artur Kosakowski edited the topic from 'Slab design / support rigidity' for better findability. 

7 REPLIES 7
Message 2 of 8
Artur.Kosakowski
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

As far as I can see you have also moments which may actually cause uplift. Try to set the nonlinear analysis parameters as below:

 

FNR7.PNG

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
Message 3 of 8
Anonymous
in reply to: Artur.Kosakowski

Hi Artur,

 

I have set this parameters previously but calculation doesn´t converge.Furthermore ,I have increased the slab thickness up to 120 mm and it doesn´t work anyway.

Message 4 of 8
Artur.Kosakowski
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

Could you attach your model?



Artur Kosakowski
Message 5 of 8
Anonymous
in reply to: Artur.Kosakowski

Hi Artur,

 

Structural model is attatched.

 

Anyway I am testing  another model with rigid links in the base of the pedestals as you can see in the picture attatched. In that way calculation seems to be ok .

 

 

 

Message 6 of 8
Artur.Kosakowski
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

All combinations converge with slightly increased tolerances.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

 

 



Artur Kosakowski
Message 7 of 8
Anonymous
in reply to: Artur.Kosakowski

Hi Artur

 

Sorry, but I don't fin what changes have your made in the solved model, tolerances seems to be the same.

On the other hand , do you think that the other solution with rigid links could be right as well?.

Message 8 of 8
Artur.Kosakowski
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

Sorry, but I don't fin what changes have your made in the solved model, tolerances seems to be the same.

 

tolerances5.PNG

 

On the other hand , do you think that the other solution with rigid links could be right as well?.

 

Yes, I think it is correct too. 

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

 

 



Artur Kosakowski

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report