Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Modal analysis

13 REPLIES 13
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 14
Anonymous
1583 Views, 13 Replies

Modal analysis

7.JPG1.JPG2.JPG3.JPG4.JPG5.JPG6.JPGHello.

I’ve got some problem during calculating 2-storey building on seismic forces. I created modal case, but the “Rel.mas.UX(%)” and “Rel.mas.Uy(%)” are too low to add seismic case. I tried to increase number of modes up to 50, but I can’t even reach 70% to do residual mode as it was mentioned in one of the Autodesk presentation. I’ve added “Load to Mass Conversion” too, but “Rel.mas.UX(%)” and “Rel.mas.Uy(%)” isn’t rising anyway.

P.S. In RSA there isn’t my country’s seismic codes, so I’m trying to calculate model with the help of spectral method.

Can someone help me solving this problem?

 

There are some screenshots below.

13 REPLIES 13
Message 2 of 14
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

File please.



Rafal Gaweda
Message 3 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Rafal.Gaweda

Thank you in advance.

 Download File

Message 4 of 14
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

Without  Active Mass Direction Z you need 8 modes.

Otherwise 226.



Rafal Gaweda
Message 5 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Rafal.Gaweda

@Rafal.Gaweda

When I turned off Active Mass Direction Z, for all modes “Rel.mas.UZ(%)” =0  it worked (percentage is higher than 70%)

According to this, I have another question:

Is it reasonable to turn off Z direction, in this calculation?

Is it okay, that for main modes, such as 1; 2; and 3,  “Rel.mas.UX(%)” and “Rel.mas.UY(%)” are lass than 70% ?

 

Tags (1)
Message 6 of 14
Simau
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

Is it reasonable to turn off Z direction, in this calculation?

 

NO, because you have very heavily loaded beams in case 2, so you can't neglect the vertical vibration of these beams.

Moreover, you  already reach 90% of mass in mode 4 for Z.

 

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 7 of 14
Simau
in reply to: Simau

@Anonymous

your structure is very steep in the first level.
If you consider that the other floors are embedded in the first level you already get 82% in X from mode 2

 

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 8 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Simau

Hi @Simau 

Firstly, thank you for response.

 

Moreover, you  already reach 90% of mass in mode 4 for Z

Is it enough, to continue calculation for seismic case, regardless  masses for X and Y aren't reached 70% ?

Your structure is very steep in the first level.

The vertical reinforced  wall (concrete plinth) in the first level is due to there are horizontal loads from ground. That's why it is steep.

If you consider that the other floors are embedded in the first level you already get 82% in X from mode 2

To be honest, i didn't understand what you mean, can you explain ?

 

Message 9 of 14
Simau
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous

 

I just wanted to point out that in very stiff structures at the bottom, the masses of these levels are mobilized only at very high frequencies, sometimes exceeding the cutoff frequency of 33Hz.
In this case a good opinion on the seismic behavior of the structure can be obtained by considering the flexible part of the built-in structure in the rigid part.

Looking at the mobilized masses in X and Y below 33 Hz, you are not so far from the 70%, so in my humble opinion you can use the residual mode.

33Hz.jpg

 

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 10 of 14
Simau
in reply to: Simau

Just to complete my point of view, in the substructure model we see that the mobilized mass is 82% at  mode 2.
So in the complete model you are sure to have mobilized all the mass of the upper part of the structure before 33Hz. This upper part being the sensitive part of the building.

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 11 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Simau

@Simau

Firstly i'm relay interested, if it is necessary to have 60 or more modes for 2-story building? 

Secondly, i can't find mobilized mass (82%) in mode 2, and which direction we're talking about? Can you show me where is it, please.

It'd be great if you advice me some manuals about this topic, so that i could read it.  

 

Thank you in advance. 

Message 12 of 14
Simau
in reply to: Anonymous

@Anonymous

Maybe I was not clear enough, sorry

 

Firstly i'm relay interested, if it is necessary to have 60 or more modes for 2-story building?

it is not a matter of number of modes, the goal is to  know if the number of mode retained is sufficient to estimate the efforts in the part of the structure which interests you.
In this case, it is the upper part of your structure that is sensitive to earthquakes. In the model (sous-structure) of this part alone, you can see that  mobilized mass is almost 100% in X and Y with only  with 7 modes.
It would be good if you compare the efforts in some elements of the high part obtained with 7 modes in these models with and without the lower part.

 

Secondly, i can't find mobilized mass (82%) in mode 2, and which direction we're talking about? Can you show me where is it, please.

The 80% in mode 2 are related  flexible structure only without the lower part, see attached file in post 7.

 

It'd be great if you advice me some manuals about this topic, so that i could read it. 

see attached file (in French :0(  )

 

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 13 of 14
Simau
in reply to: Simau

sorry

first page was missing

here new doc

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 14 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Simau

hi @Simau

Thank you for response. 
It seems, I have much to think about this topic.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report