Incorrect Data - Error Nr.5000

Incorrect Data - Error Nr.5000

Anonymous
Not applicable
9,684 Views
21 Replies
Message 1 of 22

Incorrect Data - Error Nr.5000

Anonymous
Not applicable

During the calculation of a structural model (constitute only by bars elements), when in Buckling Deformation (Analysis Type), I switch off the option Omit case for structure with deformations, an error Nr. 5000 happens, and the calculation process is stopped. This error only happens in this situation, since the model is calculated normally when that option is on.

 

Is there any way of overpass this error ?

 

Best regards,

Tarrataca 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
9,685 Views
21 Replies
Replies (21)
Message 2 of 22

Pawel.Pulak
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Error 5000 generally corresponds to memory problems.

If restarting Robot before running your model does not help please attach your model (compressed to ZIP to reduce its size) to check it in more detail.

 

Regards,


Pawel Pulak
Technical Account Specialist
0 Likes
Message 3 of 22

Pawel.Pulak
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

The model was not attached but if it is the same case are reported via reseller then the reason is in using multi-threaded solver for this type of analysis. Please change to Automatic or Sparse in Tools>Job Preferences> Structure analysis

 

---------------------------------------------
If this post answer your question please click "Accept as Solution". It will help everyone to find answer more quickly!

 

Regards,

 


Pawel Pulak
Technical Account Specialist
Message 4 of 22

jo2ny
Advocate
Advocate

I got the same error, I read the discussion above, changed the analysys method to Sparse, and back to Automatic.

When set to Automatic, Robot just crashes. When set to Sparse, i get the 5000 error.

What can I do now?

I attached the model.

 

Thanks in advance

 

I'm running Robot x64 on Win 7 x64

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9640 @3.00 GHz

8 Gb Ram

0 Likes
Message 5 of 22

Rafal.Gaweda
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Ionut 

I got the same error, 

Change structure type on SHELL ; 3D frame with FEs can not be calculated as FRAME 3D structure.



Rafal Gaweda
Message 6 of 22

jo2ny
Advocate
Advocate

Yep, worked!

 

Thanks again for your swiftness and precission.

Amazing...

0 Likes
Message 7 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

I recently run an analysis but I've got the same error

 

I've tried to follow your suggestion above (changing the solver) but the result was still the same. What should I do?

  

Thanks a lot!

 

Error 5000.png

0 Likes
Message 8 of 22

Rafal.Gaweda
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

I recently run an analysis but I've got the same error

 

File please.

 



Rafal Gaweda
0 Likes
Message 9 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Please download the file via link below because the file is quite big

 

https://share.arup.com/ExPages/filedownload.cfm?FileID=91481249ku67885300ki40800690eg

 

Thanks for the help Rafal

 

Regards,

Kurniawan

0 Likes
Message 10 of 22

Rafal.Gaweda
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

I should have been faster:

 

arup.jpg



Rafal Gaweda
0 Likes
Message 11 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi Rafal,

 

I've sent to you separately

 

Thanks

 

Regards,

Kurniawan

0 Likes
Message 12 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi

 

I'm working on a steel truss power mast and during the calculation of the structural model Robot gives me also the ERROR Nr. 5000. What am I doing wrong?

 

Many thanks in advance!

 

Analysis type settings:

0 Likes
Message 13 of 22

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Is the nonlinear analysis convergent? Is it the same after you change the solver type?

 

 



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 14 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Nonlinear analysis works fine if not selecting Buckling in the "Change of Analysis Type for Selection of Cases" dialog box. Originally I was using Sparse M solver with MDA when I got the Error Nr. 5000. When changing the solver type to Automatic, Error Nr. 5000 appears again (Seems like Sparse M is used In Automatic as well). By choosing Sparse (without M), after a 20 minute run, I get the results. I also tried Skyline wich runs approximately 5 hours. I got the warning: "Instability (of type 3) detected at node 217 in direction RX". Seems like it is releated to big differences in stiffness of elements. Am I right?

 

If so, is it correct to choose Sparse as solver and go on with the design?

 

I'm sending the file separately so You could have a look.

 

Many thanks in advance!

0 Likes
Message 15 of 22

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

If so, is it correct to choose Sparse as solver and go on with the design?

 

We haven't received the file If you checked the cause of the instability and considered it as not having any negative effect on the obtained results then I think it is.


Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 16 of 22

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

I have made the quick initial check running your model with for case 1 only. There is no instability reported.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 17 of 22

demetris.a.d
Participant
Participant

hello i have followed all the above suggestions but the error still remains.

i will attch the file

0 Likes
Message 18 of 22

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

The values of load are corrupted.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 19 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello,

 

I have been getting the same error.

 

I have tried the following:

 

 

- Changing analysis type to Sparse and Automatic. The error was removed, but even after 200 modes, the mass participation ratio is still at 5% which is not logical for such a structure.

- Tried changing the modal analysis types, but no use.

- Checking for modeling problems.

 

Compared to a working older & simpler model than the attached, it seems that the modal analysis is not working as expected. 

 

Please advise. Thank you.

0 Likes