Foundation elasticity uplift

Foundation elasticity uplift

Anonymous
Not applicable
3,306 Views
7 Replies
Message 1 of 8

Foundation elasticity uplift

Anonymous
Not applicable

I have a raft slab that along one entire edge has an approx 3.5m cantilever to avoid loading onto a zone of influence of a tunnel. I am satisfied with my elastic foundation coefficient of 6000kN/m3.

 

In the soil reactions I am getting tension which I am not happy about. Given that we will not have anything to 'hold down' that edge of the slab I need the analysis to provide no resistance to uplift. 

 

The soil reactions results display a positive reaction near the start of the cantilver as expected. But at the back end it is displaying a negative value indicating that a force is providing a resistance to the uplift. 

 

What is confusing me is that the soil reactions results remain identical whether I choose none, Uz- or Uz+ under the uplift tab. 

 

How can I ensure the raft analysis does not provide a resistance to uplift?

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
3,307 Views
7 Replies
Replies (7)
Message 2 of 8

Rafacascudo
Mentor
Mentor
Uz+ or Uz- will be according to the panel Uz local direction .In your case if thepanel local Z (red)axis is pointing upwards , then you have to use Uz+ to have uplift considered

Rafael Medeiros
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 3 of 8

Anonymous
Not applicable

If the analysis is altered so it is not to resist uplift (as I desire) then I would expect the soil reaction results for the region where I was getting negative results to be zero and a higher compression (positive) load elsewhere. Except my results are the same for all 3 types of analysis. 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 8

Rafacascudo
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

only now I could seethe model.

 

Your slab has no uplift assigned

 

no uplift.png

 

Set Uz+ and it will work

 

uplift ok.png

Rafael Medeiros
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 5 of 8

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks. 

 

I realised while i thought I had ran the analysis using the 3 different uplift options for comparison I was not saving the change so it was just running using 'none'. 

 

 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 8

Rafacascudo
Mentor
Mentor

it happensSmiley Wink

 

You should take extra care and evalute very well your loads for this situation because the slab area that is really effective is narrow and any bad evaluation of the loads could make the structure unstable in real life.

If this happens ,it can be be detected by the program as the analysis would not converge

Rafael Medeiros
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 7 of 8

Anonymous
Not applicable

If Uplift is not selected and there are negative pressures (i.e. tension in the slab), are the pressures redistributed and increased correspondingly on Robot to account for the slab's smaller bearing surface , as effectively shown by the Meyerhoff's effective area methods?

0 Likes
Message 8 of 8

Rafacascudo
Mentor
Mentor

Yes, it should, so global z translation stability can be achieved

Rafael Medeiros
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes