Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Cable design, Instability (type 1), Matrix is not positive definite

5 REPLIES 5
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 6
Anonymous
661 Views, 5 Replies

Cable design, Instability (type 1), Matrix is not positive definite

Dear all,

 

I would design a cable system, which has several hanged masses between 2 columns. i just made a simplier case with 3 wires and a truss between them subjected to tension.

 

I don`t understand the warning that I got. I tried to solve the instability with releases (fix the Rz, because Uz has to be free), but it didn`t work. Also the matrix warning, because I thought it appears because of the buckling of the column, but when I made a solid 400mm diameter column, it still appears.

 

The main goal is to define the prestressing of the cables and I will have this kind of system with 7 cables, therefore I planned to use relative elongation and iterate until I find the right position of the pre-defined nodes, where the point loads has to be.

 

Please comment my model, I would really appreciate, especially because my first experiences with this forum was great, but so far I didn`t get any other help.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

5 REPLIES 5
Message 2 of 6
vanvan11
in reply to: Anonymous

now when i calc no warnings 

is that ok? is warnings was problem

only thing i make to your model was to separate the upper cable in to 2 pcs couse point 2 which was instable to have conetions whit the upper cable

so i think that was the problem 

tell me if my solution is ok for you

see my model

sry for my bad engl

Message 3 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: vanvan11

Dear Ivan,

 

Yes, your solution was right for this model, thank you! However this model was a simplier one, the real structure is like a wire chain with some bars to keep the distance between them.

 

I attached this model, because still there are the same error messages. I dont know why, because now every cable or wires are seperated respect to the nodes.

Message 4 of 6
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

Try with elongation relative -0,0001


Rafal Gaweda
Message 5 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: Rafal.Gaweda

Dear Rafa.Gaweda,

 

Thanks for the suggestion, I guess I have to "play" with this elongations to be good for all of the cables to reach more or less zero deflections for the specific nodes.

 

However, I have now another important issue, because I can not make a proper material definition for these cables. Picture attached.

 

I would set a smaller Young modulus for the cable due to I would take into consideration that it is more flexible at the installation, also it is a high tension cable, with a larger self-weight which I can not set! Why? (It is Robot 2014 version.)

Message 6 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Please disregard my previous message. I have solved the material issue.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Technology Administrators


Autodesk Design & Make Report