Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

2D frame to Eurocode - value of XLT

13 REPLIES 13
Reply
Message 1 of 14
Anonymous
554 Views, 13 Replies

2D frame to Eurocode - value of XLT

Hi,

I'm designing a portal frame to BE EN 1993-1. My rafters fail the global stability checks for buckling resistance and bending & axial compression. I think the problem is in the calculation of chi LT (XLT in robot). Robot gives me values of XLT=0.18, while my hand cals show XLT=0.975. I attach my full calcs note

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

13 REPLIES 13
Message 2 of 14
Romanich
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous ,

Could you please also attach your hand calculations?

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


Message 3 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Romanich

Hi Romanich,

My calculated XLT was actually 0.952, but still much higher than the one calculated in robot. See attached

Message 4 of 14
Romanich
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous ,

Mcr and lateral buckling curve are different. Have you tried to input these values manually and check the results?

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


Message 5 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Romanich

Thanks for your help @Romanich ,

Changing  the Mcr and buckling curve helped. My XLT is still different, but this must be due to  a different value of beta taken by Robot.

 

Message 6 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

@Romanich ,

Just wondering why the Mcr wasn't calculated correctly? My portal frame is rather standard, so I'm surprised with the result.

Thanks, Magda

Message 7 of 14
Romanich
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous ,

Could you please attach your Robot model?

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


Message 8 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Romanich

Hi@Romanich ,

Please see attached. This is the one with Mcr changed manually. Thanks

Message 9 of 14
Romanich
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous ,

Try to zip model first or check this topic

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/sending-bigger-files/td-p/3795062

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


Message 10 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Romanich
Message 11 of 14
Romanich
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous ,

100.png

Also I would kindly recommend to always check warnings:

200.png

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


Message 12 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Romanich

Thanks @Romanich 

I'm still a bit confused with all the lengths that need to be specified (Ly; Lz; Lcr,y; Lcr,z; Lcr,low) and how they are taken into account in calculations. Are there any guidelines on how buckling calcs are dealt with in Robot?

I.e. I've changed  Lcr,low to =1.64m, beta to =0.75, lambda lt,0 to =0.4 as you suggested and I'm still getting different (than my hand calcs Mcr=1588) value for Mcr=4300.

Warnings were due to the haunch specified in the model, I have deleted it now.

 

 

Message 13 of 14
Romanich
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi @Anonymous ,

 

Please also check these topics:

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/purlins-design-lateral-buckling/m-p/3763998

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/lateral-buckling-critical-moment/m-p/3253094#M1701

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


Message 14 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Romanich

Thanks for suggestions @Romanich 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Technology Administrators


Autodesk Design & Make Report