Hi, dan.johnsonKCHZY.
I'm sorry this has been frustrating for you. I'm not terribly familiar with steel connections so I've been passing your comments and questions on to one of the developers, who has been providing the information. Your last post helped to clarify the issue, and I hope the information I have today is helpful. Here's the latest response to your comments (and a video as well):
"I believe the cause of the behaviour the user is describing is the fact that the Tube Base Plate connection (used for circular hollow section columns) has a different way of defining anchor patterns, compared to the Base Plate connection (used for W columns). By default, Tube Base Plate uses 4 different patterns of anchors of 1x2 anchors each while Base Plate only uses one pattern of anchors of 2x2 - keep in mind, these are default values, the user is able to change the number from 1x2 to 1x3, 1x4 etc. from Tube Base Plate connections properties (Upper bolts and Side bolts) and from 2x2 to 3x3, 2x3 etc. from Base Plate connection properties.
This division of the anchors from a connection to multiple patterns can be checked by doing selections using Tab key, so instead of selecting the whole connection, the anchor patterns can be selected individually (see video). After doing so, you are able to check the Properties palette for parameters of the individual anchor patterns, where you will see the same distances as in schedule.
For the Tube Base Plate case, due to the fact that the anchor patterns have 1 row of anchors on one side, the total length and intermediate distance on that side will be equal to 0. So, yes, for this case, you will only have an X distance, and a Y distance of 0 due to the fact that it's a single row on the Y direction. I hope this makes sense. I also hope the video could shed some light.
All this being said, I do recognise the fact that the way this connection has been defined in terms of anchor pattern divisions could be confusing and it could be worth re-analysing by the development team in order to make it more intuitive, easy to configure and maybe help having more useful anchor distances in schedules. So, maybe an Idea station entry could be added by the user on the Revit forum with this case so that it gets picked up by decision factors for Revit steel roadmap and possibly prioritised for future versions."
Please let me know if this explanation helps. If not, it would be great if you can send me a model that I can share with development so we can look at your dataset and make sure we're all talking about the same thing. I'll make arrangements for you to send me a model if need be.
Thanks, and let me know what you think!
Best,
Judy_S