Wall volume incorrect when Attaching Top

Wall volume incorrect when Attaching Top

Shaiki_
Advocate Advocate
1,758 Views
10 Replies
Message 1 of 11

Wall volume incorrect when Attaching Top

Shaiki_
Advocate
Advocate

I have 2 Identical solid concrete walls with a sloped top. When I attach top to a sloped reference plane, the volume is 164 cubic feet. When I edit the profile instead of attaching top, the volume is 245 cubic feet. Manual calculation says 245 cubic feet is correct. 

 

For calculating concrete volumes, this is obviously very bad. Attaching to reference planes is much better workflow-wise, so I want to know why that messes up the volume calculation. 

 

Can someone else test this and see if you have similar problems? I think it is only for sloped/gabled walls.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
1,759 Views
10 Replies
Replies (10)
Message 2 of 11

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

I can't replicate. I get the exact same volume either way.  Plus/minus 2% maybe - but 30% is an astronomical disparity.  There's got to be something else going on here.  

 

Following...

0 Likes
Message 3 of 11

Shaiki_
Advocate
Advocate

I will attach a model with these samples. Maybe something going on behind the scenes. 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 11

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

Nothing attached

0 Likes
Message 5 of 11

Shaiki_
Advocate
Advocate

 

Attached is the file. The issue came up some time during the project, because it doesn't happen in a fresh project.

 

 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 11

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

I don't readily see what the issue is with that one wall, but I can't replicate it even inside your own project.  I get 245.74 CF either way.    

0 Likes
Message 7 of 11

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant
Interesting. No answers at the moment.
0 Likes
Message 8 of 11

TripleM-Dev.net
Advisor
Advisor
Accepted solution

Hi,

 

The placed walls have indeed a different volume (area is identical however...)

After some testing I found out the Reference plane is the issue (why??).

A new wall attached to the existing reference plane also reports the wrong volume.

Attaching the existing wall to a newly placed reference plane (over the old one) will report a correct volume.

 

Tested in Revit 2020.2.3

- Michel

0 Likes
Message 9 of 11

Shaiki_
Advocate
Advocate

Thank you, that seems to work for me as well. Very confusing. I am also using Revit 2020.2 so maybe its something that got addressed in 2021.

 

Easy enough fix if its caught early enough...re-associating the reference plane does dissasociate some dimensions but overall, workable.  

0 Likes
Message 10 of 11

TripleM-Dev.net
Advisor
Advisor
Accepted solution

Hi,

 

Nope, tried same file in Revit 2021 same result.

Would suggest sending the shared file to AutoDesk, this is clearly a 'Bug' and easy detectable, see if they can find the cause of it.

Also:

- Material takeoff is also wrong.

- Audit doesn't detect/fix it.

- moving the reference plane changes the volume, but remains wrong.

- a copy of the referenceplane also results in wrong volume, only a new reference plane solves it.

 

Also from the API data I can retrieve from the old vs new reference plane; I can't see a difference.

Only a reference to Tools4Revit for the wall instance, can't see how that would result in a different Volume.

 

- Michel

 

0 Likes
Message 11 of 11

Shaiki_
Advocate
Advocate

Thank you for the thorough testing and investigation! I will try get ahold of Autodesk and see if it can be resolved.

0 Likes