URGENT! Schedules - Footer Totals - calculation does not add up

URGENT! Schedules - Footer Totals - calculation does not add up

laurenk
Advocate Advocate
5,740 Views
14 Replies
Message 1 of 15

URGENT! Schedules - Footer Totals - calculation does not add up

laurenk
Advocate
Advocate

I have created an Area Schedule which calculates the total area - as selected in the Formatting tab. (see attached)

The Area's read:

48

43

37

The Footer (totals checkbox) reads:

Total 127

 

As you can see the total is incorrect. This is likely not using the rounded values in the schedule, but calculating based on the true decimal value of each Area.

ie. 47.6 + 42.6 + 36.6 = 126.8 which rounds to 127

 

How can I adjust this to calculate the value as a rounded figure based on the scheduled values?

ie. 48 + 43 + 37 = 128

 

We require this for calculating areas for SALES CONTRACTS - purchasers enter a contract based on the ROUNDED figures.

It needs to be correct for Legal purposes.

 

Can someone please advise how we can proceed without using a text line for the totals??????

 

 

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
5,741 Views
14 Replies
Replies (14)
Message 2 of 15

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

See that box that's checked for Project Units: UN-CHECK IT. Then round to 1 decimal place...or 2...or 3...or...am I possibly not understanding the issue?

0 Likes
Message 3 of 15

laurenk
Advocate
Advocate

We want each Area to round to 1.

We want to calculate the totals of the rounded areas.


ie.
Area 1.1 = Area rounded to 1
Area 1.6 = Area rounded to 2
Area 1.6 = Area rounded to 2


Total based on decimal areas 1.1 + 1.6 + 1.6 = 4.3 (rounded to 4)
Total based on rounded areas = 1 + 2 + 2 = 5

 

When we select the footer to calculate totals - it reads the total based on decimal areas = 4 

We want a total based on the rounded areas = 5

 

Any ideas please?

 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 15

David_W_Koch
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Add a calculated value column to your schedule table, based on your area parameter [round(Area / 1 SF) * 1 SF].  Total this column, and then hide the actual area column.  The total of the calculated value column will be the total of the calculated values, not the raw areas.

2016-08-15_Revit2016_RoundedCalculatedValueInSchedule.png

 

 

 


David Koch
AutoCAD Architecture and Revit User
Blog | LinkedIn
EESignature

Message 5 of 15

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

so the issue is that you want Revit to ROUND UP, not conventionally. Then assign a calculated value parameter field: ROUNDUP("AREA PARAMETER NAME"/1). That work for you? 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 15

laurenk
Advocate
Advocate
Thanks so much David!
Alas, I wish we'd known this before the Contracts were issued.
0 Likes
Message 7 of 15

Keith_Wilkinson
Advisor
Advisor

Surely the Revit total without things being rounded is the 'correct' total?  Essentially if you round up and get to 128 rather than 127 you are selling a m2 of floor space you don't actually have?  On a very large building this 'error' could become significant.

 

On our room areas we always show to 2 decimal places and total accordingly.



"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
Maimonides
Message 8 of 15

laurenk
Advocate
Advocate
This style of calculation is not determined by us mere architects.
We must conform with the standard.
0 Likes
Message 9 of 15

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

Intriguing. Are you referring to an industry standard; perhaps an AIA contract standard? Can you cite that governing standard?

 

But nonetheless, clearly from a common-sense perspective: if all the quantities are rounded, then the reported quantities are skewed – and, as Keith rightfully points out:  significantly so depending on the unit of measurement. 

 

Thank God for CAD and BIM. I don't know what I would have done without them the last 25 years. Probably just rounded my guesstimates. 

0 Likes
Message 10 of 15

Keith_Wilkinson
Advisor
Advisor

Yes, it would be interesting to see the standard that promotes this approach. Do you have a reference @laurenk?



"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
Maimonides
0 Likes
Message 11 of 15

laurenk
Advocate
Advocate
I will assume you are in a different state, country and timezone.
I dont have time to debate.
0 Likes
Message 12 of 15

Keith_Wilkinson
Advisor
Advisor
It wasn't really a debate, just a link to the standard for other peoples reference would have been useful all round. Remember people have given up their time to help you with something, it's sometimes nice to do the same in return. But hey ho, it's up to you.


"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
Maimonides
0 Likes
Message 13 of 15

laurenk
Advocate
Advocate
I do appreciate your help Keith.
As mentioned earlier, the measurements are based on local real estate sales standards not architectural standards. I would provide these if i had time. Busy busy.
0 Likes
Message 14 of 15

Keith_Wilkinson
Advisor
Advisor
Can you at least let us know what state you are in so that we can avoid buying a house or renting and office there? ;o)


"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
Maimonides
Message 15 of 15

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant
They are most likely self-made rule by developers. When a buyer questions the accuracy of the reported area, they just say it is provided by the architect hurr durr...
0 Likes