No attachment???? I am seeing it via Outlook Express. Are you accessing
form the webside, maybe it did not come through there? I will check and try
to attach again. Either way I will get the document to you. 😉
As for Omniclass, I don't have any visibility into plans for this. Sorry.
:-( It is part of the requirements for content being posted to SEEK. You
can search the help file for a little more info on how Omniclass is being
used.
Once you get the spreadsheet I attempted to post you will have the Level 5
Uniformat codes used when this was undertaken back in 2001.
--
Jeff Hanson
SME (Subject Matter Expert)
Autodesk - BIM UX
Manchester, NH
"caLayton" wrote in message
news:6299077@discussion.autodesk.com...
"Jeff Hanson (Autodesk)" wrote in message
news:6299033@discussion.autodesk.com...
> Attached is a spreadsheet
Jeff,
No attachment?
and while we have your ear (thank you for taking the time to respond!)
what can you tell us about Adesk's intentions for integrating Omniclass into
the RVT software?
I noticed that this popped-up after recently upgrading to 2010.
I'm seeing Omniclass designations in the Window Family template in Family
Parameters, for example.
This is new, correct?
The reason I ask, is that I tend to organize and name things Bim, based upon
these standards for classifying.
I would hate to do a lot of work based upon adesk's customized "level 5"
Uniformat,
only for it to be abandoned in favor of Omniclass in a later release.
FWIW, I think that Omniclass might be a very good way to go.
It is a *very robust* classification system, that handles Assemblies similar
to Uniformat,
and Components similar to CSI MF2004. Best of both worlds...
PS I believe that there is no official "Level5" for Uniformat. Published
Documentation from Adesk on this would be very helpful to the user base...