@miguelmachadoecosta
@ToanDNdidn't say that it wasn't accurate 🙂 I said that. (Just for the avoidance of doubt … we don't want someone think he is talking bad about Autodesk's products lol)
The +/- 1% to 2% is debatable in practice (between documents issued from construction by the designer and the actual excavation on site always varied between 8-10%). In Dynamo one might end up with errors too when it comes to quantification, errors are always there regardless. No software or workflow guarantees 100% precision. The question is what are the pros and cons which one finds in different workflows. Hence, to work that out via dynamo and use solid masses/generic model is a personal opinion because it offer more to work with than using toposurface … it doesn't have to be a solution for you
With regard to your other question, the nodes are publicly available, the chart/diagram or what some call "script" is something done inhouse and not available publicly. However, I am sure you can find something on the DynamoBIM.org forum. It is quite a common workflow and I know more than a dosen of firms that use it.