Revit Accreditation - practice test broken

[mark.mountain]

SO we were looking to do the Autodesk accreditation. Though doing the practice test before the accreditation I'm filled with doubts about the actual test. 

Wording of some questions in the practice test isn't brilliant and some questions are open to interpretation. I've also done the practice test a number of times now. multiple choice questions. with only 2 answers. I've been marked incorrect on both attempts of the test giving a different answer.....

To anyone that's done the actual accredition is the final test better than the below? 

[barthbradley]

There's no such thing as a "View Box" -- so BOOYAH! 

If talking about a 3D SECTION BOX; there is no "Field of View".

Who the f*ck wrote these questions anyways? Whoever did should be given a wedgy in public view.      

...are you sure "True" and "False" are the only answers?  Scroll down and see if there's a "Neither. It's a trick question".  

...anybody that's seen "My Cousin Vinny" will get the reference.  😉

[mark.mountain]

I assumed it meant a camera 3d view and you extend the view crop region to increase the depth of field. But even with that assumption both answers are wrong! Thats my issue with it. Theres other questions that are more badly worded or using wrong terminology. The test becomes more about your ability to decipher bad questions rather than know how to use the software. Doesnt fill me with confidence for the actual test. 

[ToanDN]

[mark.mountain]

Yeah thats what i assumed it meant. With a camera view. But as mentioned above. Doesnt matter what i assumed as both answers it grades as wrong. 

[barthbradley]

Ouch!

Maybe I should be given a wedgy.  😉