LINKING FLOOR VALUES PHASES

LINKING FLOOR VALUES PHASES

wisedrawing
Collaborator Collaborator
281 Views
3 Replies
Message 1 of 4

LINKING FLOOR VALUES PHASES

wisedrawing
Collaborator
Collaborator

Weird one,

 

I have 2 floors overlapping as one is existing then demolished in 'new construction phase' and one is proposed in new construction phase.

 

I have them totally separate and they work, BUT

in the floor schedule one shows up and the phases show varied. if I change it in the table it then tells me floors overlap and the existing floor that is demolished becomes a new floor 

they seemed to become linked by the floor schedule??

 

I have deleted them both and started again, they start totally separate but the table only shows one and has the phase varies again. yet if I look at each individual floor they have the correct phases. its only when I change it on the table that it seems to force the existing floor into a new floor???

 

any ideas?

 

wisedrawing_0-1737698627714.png

 

wisedrawing_1-1737698875210.png

here as set up and as it should be showing both phases (show all)

but if I change the phase created and demolished on the table it will take the red hatch floor that is supposed to get demolished and turn it into a new floor and then tell me they are overlapping. 

 

More information:

I deleted the floor schedule and started a new one

that seemed to fix it - however

it seems that the view that I have open affects the floor schedule when I create it, I thought that would have nothing to do with it, and what populates it.

I need help on how setting up the floor schedule seems to affect the schedule in this way by linking it all. the schedule I used I have used in a template for ages and it never did that before.

 

confused!

wisedrawing_0-1737699514686.png

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
282 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)
Message 2 of 4

RDAOU
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

@wisedrawing 

 

The first schedule you had was giving the correct readings. The only issue with it was that the new/proposed Laundry PWD had the same Mark as the existing one 

 

Below is the explanation

RDAOU_1-1737706495072.png

RDAOU_0-1737704422729.png

 

The above schedule (the first one you had) implies that you have 2 or more floors elements which has the same (Mark) and the same area that are created and demolished at different phase. And the schedule is sorted using Descending values of, first the Area and then the Mark. Appart from the Mark which should be unique, this schedule is reading correctly. From the schedule I understand that you have 2x Laundary PWD each of 10m2 And if IEE is unchecked the phase created/demo'd would showas follows

  • Laundry Floor 1: Existing / New Construction
  • Laundry Floor 2: New Construction/None

The what happened in the above instance was that the Laundry floors having identical Mark  and you unchecking Itemize Every Instance combined both rows into one and calculated the total of their Area 10x2

 

Below is how your scheduled looked like (from first image) and what I think you were expecting it to look like

 

Schedule_Fix Sorting.gif

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Message 3 of 4

wisedrawing
Collaborator
Collaborator

Wow thanks for that RDAOU that's super helpful, appreciate the time you spend and it is appreciated

sorry I was out on site for a few days and away from the computer

 

cheers

 

 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 4

RDAOU
Mentor
Mentor

@wisedrawing 

 

You're most welcome... Im glad that helped

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


0 Likes