Elevation Tag w/ Fixed Labels and Body

Elevation Tag w/ Fixed Labels and Body

Anonymous
Not applicable
5,012 Views
26 Replies
Message 1 of 27

Elevation Tag w/ Fixed Labels and Body

Anonymous
Not applicable

I'm working on bringing our office CAD standards into Revit and I'm having an issue with the body moving with the pointer as the elevation tag is placed around the building. I've messed with check boxes and can't seem to find a way to make it work. Attached are images of the desired appearance in CAD and how they persistently appear in Revit. 

 

Is it possible to have the text and divider line fixed with just the pointer doing the rotating?

cad.PNGfamily.PNG

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
5,013 Views
26 Replies
Replies (26)
Message 2 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

You can certainly have different Head TYPES in one Family, each displaying different orientations, but you can't have Instance Parameters whereby you can change the head of one and not another in the Project. 

0 Likes
Message 3 of 27

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant
Bringing the View Number label inside the body is a losing battle. You would end up with multiple pointer and body types, think about placing elevations for a building with various wall angles.
Message 4 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

"Section Head - Open" is an Annotation Symbols family that comes with Revit out of the box. I can rotate this and the labels remain fixed. If anyone insists my request is not possible, can someone at least explain the difference?section bubbles.PNG

0 Likes
Message 5 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

I would like these to behave the same

demonstration.PNG

0 Likes
Message 6 of 27

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant
Section tags and Elevation tags behave differently. A section tag only for one view whereas an elevation tag can house multiple views. I have no further explanation than that.
0 Likes
Message 7 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

If you like the behavior of a Section Marker over the behavior of an Elevation Marker, why not use a Section Marker?  

0 Likes
Message 8 of 27

RDAOU
Mentor
Mentor

Unless I misunderstood something...it should be possible with a 2 types of Building Elevation Tag (single pointers)

 

The line between the detail ref and sheet ref will need to be selected on placement something similar to what @barthbradley suggested! I placed the Label sheet/detail no both in the Pointer - Always readable w/ fixed rotation (Body will be just the graphics to avoid misalignments)

 

 

ETAG.png

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


0 Likes
Message 9 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

Yep, that's exactly what I was describing. 

 

Nice presentation.

 

  

0 Likes
Message 10 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

What happened to your screencast? 

0 Likes
Message 11 of 27

RDAOU
Mentor
Mentor

Im not sure lol it was there a minute ago...if I edit post I see it has been inserted but when I post it doesn't display...they were having issues with screencast on the forum the past week maybe cuz of that

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Message 12 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you! This does accomplish what we want graphically. Could you show me how you created the families? I understand what you did just not how you made it possible.

0 Likes
Message 14 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Sorry let me clarify. I know how to create families I'm just not sure how you created the elevation tag family with the multiple check boxes and so the text remains fixed.

0 Likes
Message 15 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

The text isn't remaining "affixed". It's two different TYPES in the same family made possible with visibility parameters. You can achieve the same thing with two different families.  One Family/Type orients "this" way, the other orients "that" way.  

0 Likes
Message 16 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

I appreciate that you're trying to be helpful, but I think we're misunderstanding each other. If you know how exactly he made the particular families it'd help to let me know how. Otherwise hopefully the other guy can demonstrate. I'm messing around with visibility parameters and all I just don't exactly know what goes where and how. 

Message 17 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

Sorry. Maybe I'm speaking over your head. Are you are familiar with how to create family TYPES and how to control the visibility of elements within a family via visibility parameters?  If not, maybe it would be simpler to just create different "dumb" families.  

 

Still, I don't know why you just don't use Sections.  Like these pictured here:

 

SHeads.png

 

 

0 Likes
Message 18 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

I understand visibility parameters. I already said I've been messing around with them. I don't need to be taught how to create custom families or clarity on how to manage visibility parameter settings. I'm just asking for the specifics on how he accomplished what he did. The main reason being no matter what I try, the detail number and sheet number do not want to stay in place. I am aware of the check boxes that say Keep Readable and Fixed Rotation. Still an issue. If I can just see how he accomplished what he did, I'll be at peace. Capture.PNG

0 Likes
Message 19 of 27

barthbradley
Consultant
Consultant

Dude, all @RDAOU is doing in his screencast is switching the Elevation TYPE mid-stream.  There's no magic happening.  He's just choosing a different PREDEFINED Family/Type to place in the View.  

0 Likes
Message 20 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

What I'm asking for in several different ways is what the predefined parameters within the families are. Please, if you may as you've now began responding rudely, refrain from responding if you are not able to provide the help that I'm asking for.