while you are technically right in the endeavor to be correct, this would be over-modeling.
the specifications will list door manufacturers and describe how a door works. there is 0% chance the contractor will install a door with the pivoting point at the wrong location since no manufacturer would fabricate it the wrong way.
All the plan really needs to show is the size and direction of door, and a schedule that shows what type (brand, model, hardware etc.). In a 3D view or video, the doors are shown closed, so a realistic view is not impacted by this "fault". It probably would make more sense to physically show door hardware (panic bar etc.). But again, over-modeling and this is better handles with a schedule. Color and material also makes more sense than modeling the pivoting pint.
Not only you spend a lot of time making the family (and show all changing details), you also need more computing resources for rendering. You also would need to maintain the family when you add new features you need to show. For example if want to schedule a panic bar, I just add a parameter and schedule that. done. If you actually want to show that, you make much more effort.
All good ideas, and would be nice to have, but not necessary for most if not all construction documents. Ultimately we create a legally binding contract document. And I'm the one who modelled doors with glazing options to show correctly, so I understand the desire to be accurate.
Revit Version: R2026.4.2
Hardware: i9 14900K, 64GB, Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada 16GB
Add-ins: ElumTools; Ripple-HVAC; ElectroBIM; Qbitec