@Anonymous wrote:
No problem, although you won't get exactly the same result.
Note that Autodesk doesn't read these threads - it's a user platform, but you could post as an idea to Autodesk.
But you can also explain to your colleagues that this is a different programme to AutoCAD, and some things may look different. This does not mean that it cannot look decent. Because that's how the did it in CAD doesn't mean its the only correct option, and I would imagine that Revit will create some details or annotations that cannot be reproduced in AutoCAD.
The aim of Revit is not to emulate AutoCAD drawings.
I edited my reply as @martijn_pater had edited his post with a solution that I accepted and removed the text from my post about hoping Autodesk reads this and improves Revit...
So any forth conversation becomes offtopic. And let's continue with the offtopic. 😀
The purpose is not to emulate AutoCAD but to produce our product. Getting better tools/machinery for our production is natural step for any business. However, the revelation the new machine does many things faster/better but 1 thing cannot perform even in same level as the old machine might be frustrating. Thankfully it's not the case for this partcular issue.