You could have got that from an internet search and that process would have also forced you to consider the individual parts of the problem and what they could be used for in other forms. You just seem to be doing it parrot fashion.
It is not good for learning, humanity will not in the end benefit from it. It is all quite depressing how people are subcontracting their individual intelligence out to AI these days. I can understand how AI could be used for big picture problem solving but not 'how do I do my homework'.
The development of AI in that form will have an inverse relationship with general human intelligence level. Perhaps 'intelligence level' isn't the right phrase when I actually mean 'problem solving ability'. It is the dependency on it that will create the problems i.e. what happens when it is manipulated by the small amount of people that understand how to put bias etc. into it? The people as a whole will believe it even when it isn't being truthful.
In this context here it doesn't matter because you'll just get it wrong and realise it has mislead you. If you do a history assignment however then suddenly the history is what the system knows about and through popularity of use it becomes the perceived truth. Who or what is the arbiter of truth anyway, those texts that can be easily transcribed into a data set?