First, @JhoelForshav @_dscholtes_ @WCrihfield @robertast please allow me to apologize if my intentions were not obvious and for the late response. I had some matters that required my undivided attention and this thread grew faster than I had time to respond with the respect it deserved.
Second, thank you all for the time and effort you put in to solving this problem. This community is one of the best.
@JhoelForshav , you're a genius (period). If have any desire whatsoever to teach this stuff - please let me know so I can join! I'll even do my part in marketing your class.
In regards to what this exercise was for - I mentioned in my original post that I was simply "exploring options to a problem" and "A large part of this exercise if my personal knowledge" - the problem was in-of-itself adding a bounding box to the interior of a box. There is no one reason why I needed this function. Rather, is was just a base function for a few other methods in a much larger project which I'm playing with. In part, the add-in I'm experimenting with (in whatever free time I have) will do some supplemental processing on top of another add-in called Woodwork for Inventor (WW4I).
WW4I leverages the use of planes a lot, and the 4 planes which is part of the solution, will eventually have a lot more planes dynamically adjusted based on a list of variables.
It is quite possible that when all this is said and done, as the add-in evolves, these 4 plane might not have been needed. However, It was something which got me thinking and for the sake of learning I opted to tap into the community to see what other people (much smarter than myself) had to say on the subject. I most certainly didn't expect to find such an interest and the brilliant solutions proposed here by both @JhoelForshav and @WCrihfield
Once again, thank you all for your time efforts - I think I'll be digesting these responses for a while.
