Message 1 of 3

Not applicable
10-07-2021
10:33 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Hello,
I am having some problems when modeling a structure consisting of a frame, that is being lifted by four cables, one on each ending of the frame, as seen on the image below. This frame has also vertical loads applied to it.
My first approach was defining a simple round section and defining it as a beam, representing my cable.
- Here I got to the first problem: I could not trust totally on the model, because I could not establish a "Beam End Release" to the beam elements representing the cables (I found an Autodesk help page about it but I simply couldn't follow it, I didn't find where the instructions indicated), which means my "cable" is transmitting moment to my frame.
- Also, when checking Buckling, I kept getting the smallest eigenvalues on the cable (of course being negative, because the cables are tractioned, not compressed). I wanted to skip the cable and only analyze the frame for buckling.
Then came my second approach: using a "Cable" connector as a substitute for the "beam" cable of the first approach.
Then, I got my third issue:
- If I define a "Cable" connector, the software doesn't seem to understand that the end of the connector is a valid point for inserting a constraint. I added a sketch point on it to be sure, but it doesn't work at all. Keep getting 5001.
All that being said, I ask:
- Am I modeling it correctly? Is there any better way to model this scenario (hoisted frame)?
- Could anyone give me a more detailed and visual instruction on how to add a Beam End Release?
- How to "skip" the first mode of buckling, and even get the second, third, etc? Or ignore specific regions if the model?
- How can I define a constraint to the end of a "Cable" connector?
Any help is appreciated!!
Best Regards,
Fadi
Solved! Go to Solution.