cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Tube and PIpe Overhaul

Tube and PIpe Overhaul


I’ve been using Inventor for the past 11 years or so but only in the last 2 I’ve started using Tube and Pipe on daily bases. I’ve reviewed almost every tutorial, video, blog, existing on the matter but still find there are a lot of bugs, and room for improvement so during the course of one week while doing my daily job I’ve decided to add all the little things that got in the way of being more productive. It took another week to get the images and animations and to prepare the document but I am sure that even for non Tube and Pipe users this will make sense and cast a vote.

I am not sure if it was better to split all these ideas into separate posts or keep it as one. I think that some of the requests have been mentioned before so I apologise for that but I thought to keep it all together hopping to rather get a general overhaul of the Tube and Pipe environment so please vote for it even if they seem duplicate (add links to other posts so we can vote them there as well, please).

In no particular order here they are:

 

1 - If you don’t populate the route it can be really hard to place fittings. It doesn’t snap to nodes. Need to increase the snap influence area (or make the nodes bigger) so you can drop parts without populating the routes because this affects performance especially on large assemblies where we don’t populate until the very end. In the first part of the animation I am trying to place while in route only (or an unpopulated route) and it fails while with “populated” / ”display all objects” it’s really easy to drop fittings. Glyph and node custom size value needs implementing (nodes, arrows, etc), in T&P settings (template file) or even better in Inventor Settings customizable per user. I’ve seen a lot of requests from users of FEA and other modules as well for this.

 

image001_small.gif

 

2 - Possibility to increase the arrow sizes (glyph) when routing or rotating in T&P settings (template file) or even better in Inventor Settings customizable per user. I hold the mouse over the arrow direction while typing an angle and I constantly need to increase the size to make sure the mouse doesn’t run away and that it stays on the arrow.

 

3 - While in route you can’t delete multiple work features in Included Geometry, and you need to select and delete each one individually. This is very time consuming, and we need to be able to use delete on selected items.

 

image003.gif

 

4 - When inserting a node into a route the newly created segments should try and maintain (copy maybe) the original segment’s constraints and dimensions. We only need to dimension the position of the newly inserted node in regard to existing geometry. Fully constrained sketches go crazy when inserting a single node, removing existing constraints and deleting dimensions in the process as well.

 

image004.gif

 

5 - When placing fittings you get a rotation dialog but no “edit connection” or “change size” dialog. While in rotation mode an edit connection / change size should be available in the right click menu. You now need to start each command separately; you finish placing, select fitting, edit connection, select the fitting, change size, select fitting again, and so on in way too many steps. When you finish the Edit Connection /Change Size it should revert back to rotation mode dialog. I place similar fittings from adjacent runs because it’s easy but most of the time they are of different size and they need a different connecting dimension.

 

image005.gif

 

6 - Not all commands have shortcut keys or can be assigned keys to them. I don’t use the ribbon, and we all like the keyboard shortcut keys so please have them all available. Some things I will mention: edit fitting orientation, edit fitting connections, change fitting diameter, restore fitting, finish route (read bellow on why go to parent CTRL+ENTER is not working) etc. All these commands are only available from the right click menu or ribbon making it time consuming to use.

 

image006.png

 

7 - Included geometry inside routes (planes, points) should have visibility off as soon as you exit the route. I haven’t found anyone that needs those visible once outside the route. You certainly don’t use them for “include geometry” in other routes. Turning the visibility from visibility menu / object visibility is not an option especially for large assemblies; we need proper off for each and every, not needing to manually change their state. I would not complain if you could turn multiple features off instead of one at a time as mentioned down bellow but even better turn them off automatically and let us turn them on if we want/need to once outside the routes.

 

image007.gif

 

8 - Branches are an absolute must, tees or not. If the user doesn’t specifies a tee family in the style library (need to add a tee selection menu there) then pipes would intersect to simulate a welded connection. Notches in the larger pipe diameter should be added automatically if user settings “notch matching branches” in style selected, just like in the branch fitting author dialog. I’ve never used a cross (too expensive, company standard to avoid them) so I can’t advice on those but on tees if you have three lines with end points coincident, two of them collinear and third perpendicular (or 45 for Y) then that’s a tee connection. At least give us the option to connect them and manually place the tee, right now it complains about branches not being allowed, so you can’t connect nodes. My work around is to dimension nodes at a distance but the sketch is not fully constrained and the route segment can jump since more than one solution exists. This is how it needs to work:

 

image008.gif

 

9 - All routes need to be constrained and grounded at T&P origin to stop them from flying around. What’s the reason for not having it this way? Fittings inside the runs get connected around but the run itself never gets constrained, or moved around, individual routes are constrained by using include geometry. If needed the ground should be available to manually remove. Currently I am manually constraining the Tube and Pipe assembly and all the runs in it because if you move it by just a bit you’re pulling your hair wondering why it’s skewed.

 

image009.gif

 

10 - When placing from content center the fittings default size selection should be the last used size, instead of defaulting to first item in the list every time. This way when you start placing fittings you only choose size first time, and the rest should follow. Different route? Different size? Then change size first placed item and the rest should follow again. I was going to suggest using the run size for each content center placed fitting but each run can have multiple routes each with its own size.

 

image010.gif

 

11 - Allow multiple T&P assemblies to exist and to be editable in the same assembly. Each assembly can have only one Tube and Pipe subassembly, editable at one time, if you need to edit an assembly with multiple skids or multiple layouts (more than one T&P) assembly you can't at the moment.

 

image011.gif

 

12 - When equipment moves (defer update, or changed outside main assembly) the routes go into “violation” mode where they turn pink, and all components of the route have visibility off. At this point the route is partially blocked for editing, you can delete constraints or segments but you can’t start a route in a different point or most important can’t insert nodes. I insert nodes to change direction, orientation and brake and fix routes but I need to do it before moving equipment predicting what might go wrong, or use undo, redo to bounce back and forward predicting how the change might affect the route. Deleting segments is not an option because the end points of the segments might hold fittings that get deleted in the process and need re-placing.

 

image012.png

 

13 - T&P equipment should change size dynamically. Each Content Center fitting (pipe, elbows, tees, etc.) should get the size from the previously item populated. If I drop a reducer in the line the rest of the fittings and segments items should change automatically (Prompt the user if he wants to change, the rest of the elements along the route). The limitation here would be that it works with Content Center and iparts only, not individual authored fittings, because they don’t have a family table to feed from so they will not change as the rest (they can’t). This is how it needs to work:

 

image013.gif

 

14 - Stop routes from jumping while dragging nodes. The only way to check if a route is fully constrained and movable segments is to drag random nodes and see if they are moving. Sometimes more than one solution error occurs when the route jumps on either side of a dimension. Use negative/positive dimensions like with planes, or positive along origin indicators and negative in opposite direction, or lock the dimension in place and allow a flip option on a right click contextual menu. Sometimes a route is fully constrained but because of more than one solution on these dimensions it doesn’t report or change colour to fully constrained, or even worse, when changing dimensions you end up with overlapping and intersecting segments which goes into “Route Violation”.

 

image014.gif

 

15 - Pressing the “Return” or “Return to Parent” (CTRL+ENTER or CTRL+=) button will not exit the route environment, it will send you to 3D Sketch forcing you to press “CTRL+ENTER” again to exit route into run environment. Key shortcut for Finish Route is needed we don’t like to hunt for buttons on hidden menus ( I keep mine as Minimize to Tabs to increase display area). Sometimes when exiting the environment by using CTRL+ENTER twice doesn’t restore the visibility of the route components to on, so you need to select them all and turn them visible or edit the route and exit with the “finish route” button on the ribbon.

 

image015.gif

 

16 - Multiple selection working commands. We need to be able to run regular commands on a selection set because right now you need to select each and every component to do stuff like: change size, edit fitting connection (to increase gap distance), make adaptive, etc.

 

17 - Content Center pipes need re-authoring and ipart template should be set to “Participate in Assembly and Drawing Sections”. I’ve never wanted a pipe to run outside the section view but if I do I can turn off section participant for those ones. This needs to come in Inventor as default, not needing to republish standard CC libraries.

 

image017.gif

 

18 - Tube and Pipe Content Center items don’t get the properties specified in the Content Center family template. I get no part number and no description all the time. Make it work like steel shapes, I am not getting Description or Part number from Content Center Pipes and Spools.

 

image018.gif

 

19 - Include Route Centrelines in the drawing should show centreline for visible items only (use browser view to check which ones are visible). It’s showing for the whole Runs ending up with a lot of lines for which you need to turn visibility off, one by one.

 

image019.gif

 

20 - Manually changed pipes and fittings should stay that size when Style Size changes, because this changes everything including your manual changed elements. If you decide to change style (size of the routes) then a warning should pup-up asking for confirmation: “Sizes of some elements were manually changed. Do you want to update all? YES/NO/CANCEL”

 

image020.gif

 

21 - Changing size of multiple CC items has been approved, see here: http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-ideastation/tube-and-pipe-multiple-selection-change-size/idi-.... We need same ability for Pipes; if you select multiple pipes (in fact multiple items altogether, fittings and pipes) you should be able to use change size to modify them all as long as the families have same values for ND (or whatever they main key parameter is). If the only way of programming this into Inventor is by having same name for the key parameter on all T&P families (ND or whatever Autodesk decides) then I am ready to modify all my custom families in order to get this functionality going.

 

image021.gif

 

22 - Last used Content Center family in Change Size should be cached in memory; it takes forever for the family size menu to show up again even if you just used it.

 

image022.gif

 

23 - Can’t dynamically dimension using parameter names. When entering dimensions for route segments you can only type numerical value to start the dimension dialog, then you need to delete the value and you can type a parameter name but the dimension is changed back to a fixed value instead of being “parameter=dimension”. It seems to copy the value of the parameter like “d22=30mm” instead assigning the parameter to the dimension like “d22=vb”. I import parameters from xml for each style/size so while dimensioning I use items like “vb” (valve ball), or gp (gap), or “e” (tee and elbow)  to dimension distance between nodes based on what goes into that node ,ball valve, tee, elbow, etc.

 

image023.gif

 

24 - Constraints are not always visible for nodes. In the next image the node is coincident with the blue segment (extension of “fx:132”), and I can’t remove this constraint. ON/OFF switching of show constraints doesn’t fix it. Notice that 3D/Move Rotate is missing in the contextual menu because of the constraint being present but I can’t select it and delete it.

 

image024.gif

 

25 - Need to be able to change orientation plane for multiple dimensions while in isometric view. Right now you dimension, right click, Annotation Plane, Show All Part Work Planes, choose a different plane, click to place dimension (“spacebar” is not always working, see below). We need to be able to select multiple dimensions, and change orientation plane for all at same time.

 

image025.gif

 

26 - Need to be able to do Chain Dimension for isometric views with option for Annotation Plane. Right now we need to manually dimension each route segment and choose annotation (“spacebar not always working, see below) plane which is very time-consuming.

 

image026.gif

 

27 - Make “SPACEBAR” work all the time for quick changing annotation plane while dimensioning Isometric drawings. Next I am showing how it’s meant to work and that sometimes it’s not and you need to manually specify work plane annotation. It’s not always working while selecting segments; you need to play with selecting segment end points.

 

image027.gif

 

 28 - Exit without saving still saves changes. If you use change size on pipes and then you close without saving it still saves the file, even if you shut down inventor to clear its cache memory and start a new session, the changes are persistent.

 

image028.gif

 

 29 - Decrease the length of the generated files and folders for any design accelerator, tube and pipe, frame generator, FEA items. It’s so easy to pass the 256 accepted characters in Microsoft Windows and you end up with all sort of problems, like unable to access and recover parts.

 

 

 

The next one I can’t reproduce, I've been having it but I can’t seem to be able to get it again, so if anyone has seen this and has a case at hand please add it in the comments bellow.

 

30 - While moving equipment around some routes go into “Violation” mode and the only option is to CANCEL the command which will undo your work, and to edit the route braking constraints or deleting dimensions first. This is somehow related and really a continuation of the first one, so even if the route goes into “violation” the operation should be permitted to finalize and let the user change the route manually later in order to fix it.

 

 

 

91 Comments
FProcp
Collaborator

Need to be able to dimension between piping projected intersction points.

Should be able to select the Intersection Points on the elbows where the Red circles are shown in the picture below.

I had to edit all fittings in my Content Center and add a 3D sketch to show the IP.

This could then be selected for dimensioning.

 

Tube_Pip.JPG

salariua
Mentor

@FProcp I feel there's something missing on your presentation. You need to use the Include Route Centerlines and then you can dimension the route.

 

You can do it on whole TP asm, or individual Runs.

 

2015-10-29_13-58-29.png

FProcp
Collaborator
Spoiler
Smiley Surprised  Wow, has this always been available? I did those drawings many years ago.

 

salariua
Mentor

71 – Please turn hose 3D sketch visibility OFF by default. The route can be visible but the hose 3D sketch is visible as well and I can’t see why anyone would need that especially in cases like mine where I have clear tubing.

 

150129-71.gif

salariua
Mentor

72 – Allow all fittings to be used with Insert Fitting command because only some will permit insertion (Content Center only maybe?!?). I need to insert a standard fitting, and then place my fitting on top of that to get it to work; a lot of extra steps if you ask me.

 

150129-72.gif

salariua
Mentor

73 – Placing an already existing library fitting (not CC) will trigger a “do you want to check it out of vault?” question . What’s placing got to do with checking it out especially since the fitting exists in the assembly.

 

150129-73.gif

salariua
Mentor

74 - On consecutive inserted fittings while rotating a fitting the ones that follow should only rotate IF the connection is of type flanged where the bolt holes need to match. On connections like welded, clamped, joined, etc. the fittings that follow should not rotate. However as mentioned we need to be able to select multiple fittings and choose edit orientation. If it’s too difficult to implement then only rotate the ones with similar connection orientation (vector direction).

 

150129-74.gif

Anonymous
Not applicable

WOW, awesome post and extra kudos for the effort you put into this @salariua. I've watched some of your videos on the T&P tool (which are great) as we are planning to start using the tool soon to update our fluids department. But after seeing this post I'm starting to think we should reconsider using a different software package for this. We are looking to update and get ready for the next 10 years, but if this tool hasn't been updated at all and does not get a complete overhaul as is needed by now, there is no point in using it.

salariua
Mentor

@Anonymous,

 

I don’t think you should exclude Inventor just because there are a lot of improvements to be made. Besides these are all my ramblings and they don’t necessarily represent the opinion of other users.

 

On these bases I urge you to ask for a test drive. Ask your other CAD supplier to do one of your projects and ask an Inventor expert to do it. Make sure to verify how much time it needs to configure the project, setup the libraries, templates, how much it takes to configure and maintain really.

 

I am with Veolia in UK and my office is about the only one still using Inventor while others shifted to ProE/Creo as the recommended package but NONE of the business units have the speed, flexibility we have. By the time they start a job we’ve finished 10; it’s only 2 of us in the CAD office and, as you can see, I am in the forum all the time (LOL) and we’re still miles ahead.

 

salariua
Mentor

UPDATE:

 

Over the past couple of months I have been in contact Autodesk, (@dan_szymanski) and he has assured me that T&P is high on their list now so we have managed to get the attention we needed for this outdated module.

 

Unfortunately this means that I need to split this post and create separate Ideas out of each one so we can get them solved by number of votes (affected people) rather than latest and loudest.

 

The original plan was to keep it all as a single entry and make the developers get the full picture but the negative comments are turning users away from T&P. What we need to understand is that some of my requests are referring to Inventor in general, others are my own imagination, and some of them are not to be found in any other pipe design software. While I wish my car had screen-in-screen mirrors and self adjusting dash lights it doesn’t make it a bad car and it’s certainly no indication on the performance of the vehicle.

 

I want to thank you all for the votes and to ask you to keep watching the Idea Station for new posts from me. I have documented another 60 TP ideas or so but I won’t be posting them under this general Overhaul anymore.

 

However, from now on you should stick to voting ONLY for those that you feel will improve your work and make a difference in Tube and Pipe, Routed Systems. Casting a vote just because you trust my imagination won’t do, we need to find the 20/80 ratio and solve those that will really make a difference.

 

As mentioned before Inventor gave our small design office the speed and flexibility that larger hubs with heavier CAD software can never achieve.

 

Thank You,

ADS.

FProcp
Collaborator
Thanks very much for the big effort on improving Inventor Tube and Pipe!

Please read one more comment I've added to the group.



http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-ideas/tube-and-pipe-overhaul-cut-back
-elbows/idi-p/6403810



Frank
JaroslavSereda9518
Participant

Amazinng work, thanks Salariua

we have been trying to persuade Autodeska  from 2008 to improve that part of Inventor. U think that part of Inventor looks like brontosaurus.  I hope, that your Ideas could make Autodesk to think over. In the past I put my Idea. So I recommend to include another parts :

1. to have posibility to use insulations - with present possibilities it is very complicated, because we we should need too many type of pipe styles

2. to have posibiliti copying piping runs

3. to have support in using support elements e.g. to use physics for dimensioning

 

once again thanks for your work

 

Reee

dan_szymanski
Autodesk
Status changed to: Future Consideration

Epic Idea added to backlog for future consideration [777]. Understanding there are many individual asks within this single Idea.  Thanks!

JaroslavSereda9518
Participant
Hi,
my view is that is very bad news, because we are waiting for improvement
of TaP module...
very bad news...

Jaroslav
hartogj
Community Manager
We are trying to organize this Ideas forum so it's more searchable and gives you a better understanding of where these Ideas stand. The status was changed on this Idea to get the categorization right, not to indicate that it's lower priority than it was before.

As Dan said this is an epic idea! There's a lot in here, all thoroughly documented. Near term, we are looking at tube and pipe performance to see what can be done to improve speed and general usability. It is research and it's too early to know what will be possible, but it makes sense to look into the foundation first. Beyond that we intend to look into specific workflow improvements. The alpha & beta program is another place you can go to see what's going on in Inventor development.

Jon
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

 

The problem we are facing is the fact that the Bend machine output coordinates starts at the origin of the assembly. But the manufacturer who bends our piping requiers a bend table wich starts at the origin of the pipe itself. Now we have to do a lot of extra work to get the specified information out of the 3D model.

I wondered if there is some software in development or already for use as a plug-in or somehow which fixes our problem and saves us a lot of time.

dan_szymanski
Autodesk

Hello everyone,

Simply a heads up - Item #28 has been fixed within Autodesk Inventor 2018.2.   Per @salariua #28 - "Exit without saving still saves changes. If you use change size on pipes and then you close without saving it still saves the file, even if you shut down inventor to clear its cache memory and start a new session, the changes are persistent."  ""in my case it doesn't even give me a heads-up. You change stuff, shutdown NO SAVE, start AIP, it's all changed."

We no longer save the change if you close without saving.  This was a part of an initiative we are continuing to invest in, while addressing other save (dirty) scenarios, as referenced here: Stop telling me I need to save something I haven't changed  Thanks! -Dan

Anonymous
Not applicable

quote: "As the title suggests, we need full time commitment and a general update. Take your time and develop this module, don’t just fix the issues pointed out, review what others are doing, do customer surveys, brainstorm sessions or whatever you guys need to get us back on track with the rest of Inventor and the market in general."

 

Are there any plans in doing so, Autodesk?

dan_szymanski
Autodesk

Hello @Anonymous, I can assure you we are having many conversations regarding this topic. I would encourage you to join some of the discussions within our internal Feedback Community, here:  https://Autode.sk/InventorBeta

Regards,

Dan

lance8
Enthusiast

@salariua 

OMG - I am a long time INV user and have thankfully NEVER had to use the T+P features

Always wondered what it was like to use - Expected to be as you have shown in your videos and excellent presentations

Voted Yes to this as this is similar to the types of things FG is missing, especially for Handrails/stairways etc

 

 

 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea