Sweep Issue

Sweep Issue

TEDPOWERTRAIN
Advocate Advocate
743 Views
7 Replies
Message 1 of 8

Sweep Issue

TEDPOWERTRAIN
Advocate
Advocate

Hi

 

I don't why I can't sweep the following sketch. The file is too big. I uploaded it to google Drive. 

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wlxcs-t7pQgDdBSU7fiiD6hsYBATR4Ae/view?usp=sharing

TEDPOWERTRAIN_1-1688216147409.png

 

TEDPOWERTRAIN_0-1688216091087.png

Ted

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
744 Views
7 Replies
Replies (7)
Message 2 of 8

CCarreiras
Mentor
Mentor

Hi!

 

You have all profiles disconnected, if you drag the geometry you will find it:

CCarreiras_1-1688220032356.png

 

First, connect the geometry to have a closed profile.

Add some constraints like collinear, connect, equal, etc to improve the sketch.

Turn all the elements that don't belong to the profile into construction geometry to help the software recognize only the profile geometry.

 

Add a rail in a 2D sketch, since it´s not accepting the 3D rail.
Create the "loft surface".

CCarreiras_0-1688219345520.png

 

"Close" the surface with Patch

"Sculp" the 3 surfaces, and got the solid.

 

CCarreiras_2-1688220445693.png

 

 

CCarreiras

EESignature

Message 3 of 8

TEDPOWERTRAIN
Advocate
Advocate

Hi @CCarreiras 

 

I still don't quite get how to do it. Is it possible to make a screen record.

 

Ted

Thanks

0 Likes
Message 4 of 8

pcrawley
Advisor
Advisor

Looks like @CCarreiras is on the case - so I'm staying out of it.

 

To record your screen (no cost but donations welcome) https://www.screentogif.com/

  • Remember to keep the recordings short and to the point.
  • Only record the area of interest - preferably including the browser.
  • Edit your recording before posting to delete any unnecessary pauses or mistakes.
Peter
Message 5 of 8

CCarreiras
Mentor
Mentor

HI @TEDPOWERTRAIN 

There are so many things going on on this, it's impossible to make a little video with everything.

I send you the file and you can analyze it and try to replicate it in your model.

 

Note:
For size questions, i compacted the browser tree, don't forget to expand it again to see all the features.

RMB and select "Move EOP to the end"

CCarreiras_0-1688301798795.png

 

@pcrawley Thank you for the gift creator link, i will try it.

CCarreiras

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 6 of 8

TEDPOWERTRAIN
Advocate
Advocate

hi @CCarreiras 

 

I am just curious. Why the file that you have attached is smaller than my previous file about 10mb after expansion.

 

Doesn't more stuff equals to bigger file size. 

 

Ted

 

0 Likes
Message 7 of 8

CCarreiras
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Hi!

 

I don't know the reason, but... maybe fully constrained geometry will need less info than free geometry.

CCarreiras

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 8 of 8

pcrawley
Advisor
Advisor

The file was smaller because the "End of Part" marker was rolled up near the top of the tree.  Geometry takes more space in the file than the instructions to build it.

 

Move the EOP marker to the top of the model tree and check the file size - then move it to the bottom and check the file size again.  When the EOP is at the top of the tree, the file only contains the instructions to build the geometry - not the geometry itself - so the file is much smaller.  Back in the "old days" of Inventor and dial-up internet, moving the EOP was a great way to send files more efficiently, or to archive old projects on expensive storage devices.

Peter
0 Likes