Sheet metal - Cormer seam

[chachaman]

Hello,

I come back often for this issue.

Please see attached image of a corner. It is as I want it.

When I change the angle of the Flange called 91_Degree_Flange to the intended 91 degrees, the corner changes to something ugly.

Can anyone get the corner to work at it's intended 91 degrees ?

Thanks

[Thomas_Savage]

Hello @chachaman 

I have attached a screenshot of the part at 91 Degrees, where on the side places a big relief. Is this the problem you mentioned? If so, after changed the bend to 91 Degrees i then deleted the Corner Seam below the flange. 

This corrected the problem. The Corner Seam you placed interfered with the fold.

In the screenshot i just moved the End of Part to show it solving the problem. But the Corner Seam can be deleted.

Hope this helps and has solved your problem??

[chachaman]

Hello your seam is nice however you appear to be using a symetric gap seam whereas I am looking for an overlap seam....please see image.

Can you achieve as good a result with the overlap seam ? If so, please tell me how ?

[chachaman · Accepted solution]

To all those who might encounter this problem, here is the solutions that worked for me.....see attachmentÈ

[IgorMir]

Hi Angelo;

I don't think - there would be many people, encountering such a problem. The part you have created is, effectively - an assembly. Maybe you intended the part to be a multi-solid one. For future creation of individual parts. But your file does not reflect it. Yet, if multi-solid approach is to be implemented - than your finding is helpful, of course.

Cheers,

Igor.

---

@chachaman wrote:

To all those who might encounter this problem, here is the solutions that worked for me.....see attachmentÈ

---

[chachaman]

Hello Igor,

the part is indeed a multi-body part from which individual parts are then created.

Thank you for your interest and contribution.

Kind regards...

[IgorMir]

Hi Angelo;

If I was designing these items - I would rather model them as it is shown in the attached picture. 

But maybe your design intent is somewhat different to what I understood from the file of yours.

Cheers,

Igor.

---

@chachaman wrote:

Hello Igor,

the part is indeed a multi-body part from which individual parts are then created.

Thank you for your interest and contribution.

Kind regards...

---