Parts List, mark numbers ( instance properties) question

Parts List, mark numbers ( instance properties) question

Curtis_Waguespack
Consultant Consultant
129 Views
5 Replies
Message 1 of 6

Parts List, mark numbers ( instance properties) question

Curtis_Waguespack
Consultant
Consultant

Before I go reinventing the wheel, could someone kindly confirm for me that Inventor can or can not give us this result out of the box.

With a weldment frame:

  • I want to have parts rolled up to show an item qty for each member that is the same part number ( ITEM QTY = 2 as shown) 
  • I want to assign part marks for each instance to mark them with unique mark numbers, I can do this using Instance Properties
  • I want to list the mark numbers for each part number as shown in the parts list ( M01, M08) 
    • This does not seem possible without manual input or some iLogic to automate this.
    • So this is the part I'm asking about, is there a way to do this "out of the box" ?

 

Curtis_Waguespack_0-1757355820860.png

Curtis_Waguespack_2-1757356408530.png

 

 

 

EESignature

0 Likes
130 Views
5 Replies
Replies (5)
Message 2 of 6

dan_inv09
Advisor
Advisor

So, you want this

dan_inv09_0-1757359682713.png

to include "comma separated list of values"

Message 3 of 6

kacper.suchomski
Mentor
Mentor

Hi Curtis

I managed to achieve part of your goal.

The markings in the view are ready.
However, I'm having trouble getting these items on the parts list and I admit I don't remember how to achieve this.

kacpersuchomski_0-1757360681675.png

Balloon descriptions are just a matter of defining the style appropriately in S&SE.
However, at the moment I do not know how to change the content in the table from "various values" to an actual list of these values.

 

Out of curiosity, I'm curious - why do you need the instance property?

If you use the Reuse command during the modeling process, with the appropriate parts list composition, you'll receive the same item numbers, piece length, and quantity for the corresponding profiles.


Kacper Suchomski

EESignature


YouTube - Inventor tutorials | LinkedIn | Instagram

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.


Message 4 of 6

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi Curtis,

 

I could be wrong but I believe you will need to use Group Settings to do that. Please feel free to share the example files here or send them to me directly at johnson.shiue@autodesk.com. I would like to understand it better.

Many thanks!



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
Message 5 of 6

Curtis_Waguespack
Consultant
Consultant

Thanks everyone (and extra thanks @kacper.suchomski  for the extra effort of setting up your own data set) , I had intended to include my simple set but got distracted, but here it is, the files are Inventor 2025 files.

I tried to configure the group and substitution settings, but I can not get them to give me the list of Mark Numbers.

 

But admittingly it's been a long time since I've looked at those settings, so I might be forgetting something.

 

Curtis_Waguespack_0-1757456369119.png

 

 

Thanks again everyone, for taking the time to look at this!

 




EESignature

Message 6 of 6

Curtis_Waguespack
Consultant
Consultant

@kacper.suchomski wrote:

 

Out of curiosity, I'm curious - why do you need the instance property?

If you use the Reuse command during the modeling process, with the appropriate parts list composition, you'll receive the same item numbers, piece length, and quantity for the corresponding profiles.


@kacper.suchomski , good question.

I'm exploring a workflow for someone else. And while I am using the Frame Generator Reuse option, the goal is to have a unique identifier for each piece in the assembly, and maybe use the instance property to tie it to the assembly weldment part number, and also allow the part numbers/files names to stay the same, while having mark numbers that could be renumbered/reordered during revisions to the drawing that don't impact the part.

I'm not sure if this is way we want to go, but as a first step I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing an option to get these results with the out of the box tools before going further.


EESignature