I should like Ray's version better than mine, too. I've made some other
attempts using Inventor, but none of them was really smooth.
But I've made an Inventor section analysis of Ray's Rhino version, and it's
looking very good.
;-) And Shekar has been reading here. Maybe a challenge for a future release
..
Walter
"Ray Dyson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:5385587@discussion.autodesk.com...
I like mine better than Walters. Unfortunately it wasn't made with IV. I
added the holes to see if the solid would be editable since it shows to have
errors.
I'd do a quality check, but you can see from the jpeg that something is
trashed in this install.
Ray
"W. Holzwarth" wrote in message
news:5385538@discussion.autodesk.com...
It's not a real difference in modeling, Jeffery, in my eyes. And I'm more
than sure, that you'll agree with me.
But look here:
http://www.w
undersamessammelsurium.de/Mathematisches/Torkler/index.html
There are some lines about the oloid. And they are telling, that the
distance between the circle's center points equals their radii.
But, as mentioned before: Not a big change for a parametric system.
Walter
schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:5385550@discussion.autodesk.com...
The way I read it the radius of each is equal but the distance between
centers is r(2^(1/2)). I did a twisted band a couple of months ago that
might l
end a solution but of course can't find it now with search.