Announcements
Visit Fusion 360 Feedback Hub, the great way to connect to our Product, UX, and Research teams. See you there!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Better Constraints and Dimensions.

Better Constraints and Dimensions.

 I tried to draw a part from some reference sizes today and found it very difficult because I was unable to add some constrains and dimensions. I've drawn the part in another system very easily here are some of the problems.

 

1. No perpendicular constraint to a circle. Example from other program.

Clipboard01.png

2. No dimension from a line to the circumference of a circle or between circle edges.

Clipboard02.png

3. No automatic projection of axis when adding dimensions or constrains.

4. Automatic projection when dimensioning would be more useful if the lines created were construction lines.

5. A way to draw construction geometry without having to draw as normal lines first. Maybe a toggle so you either draw normal or construction.

 

Mark

7 Comments
TrippyLighting
Consultant

While all of these can be dealt with by drawig additional construction lines, having to first draw a normal line and then convert it into a construction line to then dimension as desired really adds insut to injury!

Thus I find #5 to be the highest priority in the list.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Separating vertical and horizontal constraint would also be helpful. Just as it is in Inventor. At present its not clear how to toggle between horizontal or vertical when placing a constraint.

yoshimitsuspeed
Advisor

I was very surprised you couldn't do a perpendicular constraint to an arc/circle when I first found F360.
I learned that you are expected to constrain the centerpoint of the arc to the line using a coincedent constraint. This will put the line perpendicular to the arc. I still get annoyed every time I have to do this and definitely think you should be able to use the perpendicular constraint.

 

schneik-adsk
Community Manager
Status changed to: オートデスク今後検討
 
promm
Alumni
Status changed to: Future Consideration

Thank you for your ideas, I am changing this to future consideration.  I want to be very clear, there are 5 ideas here and while they are all good ideas I am only considering 2 and 5 for future consideration.  Both dimensioning to a circles edge (tangent) and the ability to select construction before adding geometry are in our backlog.  As for the rest of the ideas, consider them archived.

 

Cheers,

 

Mike Prom

HughesTooling
Consultant

OK thanks I've resubmitted #3 HERE

 

Mark

kellings
Advisor

It kind of boggles my mind how something like this is being classified as a future consideration. Are there any other cad programs that can't dimension to a tangent? I love new things, but maybe it's time to start making sure the basics have been implemented before building on a poor foundation.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea