@lance.carocci
Hi everyone,
My name is Younes Daneshvar, and I’m an industrial designer with over 15 years of experience. Throughout my career, I’ve worked extensively with a range of 3D modeling software including SolidWorks, Rhino, AutoCAD, and Fusion 360. Currently, Fusion 360 is my primary tool of choice.
In addition to industrial design, I have strong experience in UI and UX design for digital applications. In the design field, we often refer to the concept of "affordance" the perceived and actual properties of an object that indicate how it can be used. Over time, our minds naturally adapt to common affordances; for example, in many 3D modeling tools, pressing the spacebar repeats the last command.
However, in Fusion’s workspace, I often find myself instinctively pressing the spacebar expecting it to repeat the previous action, only to be reminded that this behavior isn’t supported. It may seem minor, but for professional users, these small breaks in interaction design can disrupt workflow and productivity.
An exaggerated but relevant comparison is ZBrush, a powerful software whose unconventional UI and interaction logic have often been cited as barriers to broader adoption. In my opinion, design decisions that ignore established affordances can alienate experienced users and impact overall usability.
Thanks for reading—looking forward to hearing your thoughts.