Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
Hi @douglasWGL2M , can you share more on why you would like to have this information on a label? As of today we have header sheets that allow to have all the operations (even though is a large document, with many other details).
Moreover, if the production order has 2 products, would you like to have 1 label (with both products and corresponding operations), or 2 labels (one with the operations of each product)?
Hi @andrade_david , the reason for having the operations listed on the label would be to track the progress of the product. To see if the necessary operations have been completed from a shop floor worker standpoint without having to access the Fuison Operations application.
The header sheets provide all the operations on a Production Order, along with other details such as machines, consumptions and sections. Is there any reason for not printing this existing document when activating a new Production Order on the shop floor?
What I'm looking for seems to be the product's spec sheet. We don't necessarily want all of the information on the header sheet, but the spec sheet seems to have all of the information we do require for this purpose.
Indeed, that is also a possible approach and the document contains a less of data compared to the production orders header sheets. Since the solution you presented is a valid alternative and allows you to get the desired outcome, I've archived this idea.
