This software is crap

This software is crap

riccardo.bartolucci
Explorer Explorer
8,364 Views
59 Replies
Message 1 of 60

This software is crap

riccardo.bartolucci
Explorer
Explorer

All references of future feature are lost after changing a previous sketch.

As result I keep fixing problems instead of producing a result.

Thanks

Reply
Reply
8,365 Views
59 Replies
Replies (59)
Message 41 of 60

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous this forum is mostly (95% +) a peer to peer forum where more advanced and experienced users help often new and inexperienced users.

Most users (99%) come here looking for help and usually we can resolve the issues they are encountering. 

 

If you are encountering such issues then create a new thread and post your troubles there. Perhaps you can adjust your attitude because we do this  on a voluntary basis and for fun 😉

 

 


EESignature

Reply
Reply
Message 42 of 60

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous wrote:

I don't believe it, sorry. 


@Anonymous 

How much of a wager would you be willing to put up to back up your (incorrect) belief?

 

How many (specific rather than general) questions have you posted here when you ran into trouble?

 

Why is file management (in any computer software) an issue?

 

(I am not the usual fanboy - I don't even use Fusion for my work (it doesn't have the functionality that I need) other than a bit of analysis, but I have learned how to use it.)

Reply
Reply
Message 43 of 60

stiller.design
Collaborator
Collaborator

For the trolls saying Fusion 360 is crap: there are plenty of other options out there, your whining doesnt help anyone. try Freecad, tinkercad if you are a rookie or just use pen paper and a ruler...please get off the internet and get a life

Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 44 of 60

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@stiller.design wrote:

For the trolls saying Fusion 360 is crap: there are plenty of other options out there,......please get off the internet and get a life


That is why I use other options (but certainly not the options you list).

I have a very nice life - thank you!

Reply
Reply
Message 45 of 60

Anonymous
Not applicable

Sorry, I'm not even prepared to waste time  discussing the matter further. We used to call Trolls 'Flames', the same  meaning at another age.  

Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 46 of 60

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous wrote:

Sorry, I'm not even prepared….


Understood.

Reply
Reply
Message 47 of 60

khushaldas.badhan.001
Explorer
Explorer

The software is crap not the operator. Anything that can be accomplished in Solidworks within few minutes takes half hour to one hour in Fusion 360. Example, copy with mates in Solidworks.

Reply
Reply
Message 48 of 60

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

If a sub-assembly is created properly in Fusion 360 it can be copy/pasted (instanced) with all functioning joints.

 

If you really want to get into a comparison of the strengths of difference CAD software packages, I'd be happy to do so.

A word of caution, though. I've worked with a variety of 3D modeling and CAD software professionally and across a range of disciplines since college so for over 30 years. I've worked (and still do) with SolidWorks since 1998.

 


EESignature

Reply
Reply
Message 49 of 60

dieselguy65
Collaborator
Collaborator
Well, my suggestion would be keep using SW if you like it. No need to even
come here.
But, there sure are alot of people successfully using fusion 360.
Maybe it's just you.....
Reply
Reply
Message 50 of 60

khushaldas.badhan.001
Explorer
Explorer

The specific feature I'm refering to is not copying the whole assembly but for example, when you have 40 bolts to be assembled, in Solidworks it is much faster as mates are kept same on the same components and you only need to select faces for respected mates without needing to copy every time.

FYI, I'm replying to you while I wait for Fusion to recover from stitching process which it is doing since last 15 mins.

Reply
Reply
Message 51 of 60

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@khushaldas.badhan.001 wrote:

The specific feature I'm refering to is not copying the whole assembly but for example, when you have 40 bolts to be assembled, in Solidworks it is much faster as mates are kept same on the same components and you only need to select faces for respected mates without needing to copy every time.

 


As I've mentioned, I am fully aware of what the differences between SolidWorks and Fusion 360 are. I would venture a guess that I have much, much more professional experience in both software packages than you do!!!

 

If larger assemblies with many fasteners are your domain, then perhaps Fusion 360 is not the right tool for you. I would venture another guess, though that you are not paying for the tool you are using, and the Institution that employs you provide the tool. Once you have to fork over hard cash to pay for the tool out of your own pocket things look different.

 

None of the above means that Fusion 360 is crap!

I personally use Fusion 360 professionally and very successfully in an engineering role.

 


@khushaldas.badhan.001 wrote:

I'm replying to you while I wait for Fusion to recover from stitching process which it is doing since last 15 mins.


That usually means that your geometry is questionable.

I would suggest you create a separate thread and post the problem and model.


EESignature

Reply
Reply
Message 52 of 60

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@khushaldas.badhan.001 wrote:

1. ... in Solidworks ...

2.  I wait for Fusion to recover from stitching process which it is doing since last 15 mins.


1. Autodesk Inventor Professional is the Autodesk MCAD product equivalent of SolidWorks - not Fusion 360.

2. Attach the file here.  I'll wager that I can identify the issue within 1.5 minutes.

2b.  Logically, you should have started a new discussion thread for this issue.

Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 53 of 60

mia_wilson
Observer
Observer

@mia_wilson - This post has been edited due to Community Rules & Etiquette violation.

Completely agree. Swear you need a quantum computer to draw anything but a straight line. Can spend like 20 minutes waiting for something to compute to be told it won't work. 

 

All the other cad software I have used is way more optimised and works so much more smoothly. 

 

Fusion 360 is just for big old companies who can afford to spend silly money on computers and software. The monthly cost is just stupid and the 10 personal model thing for hobbyist is also just bs. 

Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 54 of 60

mia_wilson
Observer
Observer

You're acting like he's annoyed at you. I mean surely you can understand someone's frustration with this software or have you never experienced issues with fusion...if you answer is you haven't then we clearly can see we have a fanboy on our hands 

Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 55 of 60

mia_wilson
Observer
Observer
Autodesk pricing model is awesome...alright whichever Autodesk employee this is get off the forum 🤣
Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 56 of 60

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@mia_wilson wrote:

Completely agree. Swear you need a quantum computer to draw anything but a straight line. Can spend like 20 minutes waiting for something to compute to be told it won't work. 

Can you share a model that exhibits that behavior in a new, dedicated thread , so we might analyze it and provide feedback?

 


@mia_wilson wrote:

 

All the other cad software I have used is way more optimised and works so much more smoothly. 

 


Can you elaborate which those are ?

My suspicion is that you are not so familiar with professional level parametric CAD software. I've used CAD software for over 3 decades professionally and some things work better in other CAD software, other things work better in Fusion 360.

 


@mia_wilson wrote:

 

Fusion 360 is just for big old companies who can afford to spend silly money on computers and software.


Amongst all the professional level CAD software I've used as an Engineer, Fusion 360 is not only  the most intuitive to learn, it is also very inexpensive and when used in conjunction with CAM, Electronics, or Generative design it is an outstanding killer deal!

 

@mia_wilson - This post has been edited due to Community Rules & Etiquette violation.

 


@Discussion_Admin perhaps we can remove that last sentence ?


EESignature

Reply
Reply
Message 57 of 60

g-andresen
Consultant
Consultant

Hi,


@mia_wilson wrote:

 ... understand someone's frustration ...


First of all, I would like to state that there is no software that is permanently operated error-free by every user.
Regarding your contributions:
Why do you think that there is no one in the numerous posts who would have provided a file to back up their statements?

 

günther

Reply
Reply
Message 58 of 60

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@mia_wilson wrote:

Swear you need a quantum computer to draw anything but a straight line.

 

Can spend like 20 minutes waiting for something to compute to be told it won't work. 

 

All the other cad software I have used is way more optimised and works so much more smoothly. 

 

Fusion 360 is just for big old companies who can afford to spend silly money on computers and software.

 

The monthly cost is just stupid and the 10 personal model thing for hobbyist is also just bs. 


@mia_wilson 

I am running fine on a 10 year old computer, but then I understand computationally efficient techniques.

 

@mia_wilson 

If you are waiting 20 minutes for an operation to complete then you are not using computationally efficient techniques.  I’ll make wager that I can find things like unnecessary sketch patterns, unconstrained sketches, unresolved issues highlighted in your Timeline, unnecessary Moves.  None of this is specific to Fusion.  Using computationally efficient techniques is, of course, the logical procedure in any CAD software and identical. 

@mia_wilson 

You have not mentioned the other software or provided evidence.  Geometry is geometry. 

@mia_wilson 

I am retired - running a 10 year old computer.

 

@mia_wilson 

Yes, everything should be free and unlimited.  I give away my advice for free and as much of it as you want.  I will even teach you how to use CAD software for free.

 

Reply
Reply
Message 59 of 60

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@mia_wilson wrote:

I mean surely you can understand someone's frustration with this software…


@mia_wilson 

Where did you go?

Can you File>Export your *.f3d file to your local drive and then Attach it here to a Reply?

Reply
Reply
0 Likes
Message 60 of 60

mackenzie_smith7CP82
Autodesk
Autodesk

All replies have been turned off by the moderation team. We encourage you to create a new thread on a similar subject as you feel necessary. 

Reply
Reply