Community
Fusion Design, Validate & Document
Stuck on a workflow? Have a tricky question about a Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) feature? Share your project, tips and tricks, ask questions, and get advice from the community.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Pocket holes are too small in diameter - CAM output

7 REPLIES 7
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 8
joeldbutler
2455 Views, 7 Replies

Pocket holes are too small in diameter - CAM output

I'm having an issue with circular pockets not cutting to the correct diameter.

 

I'm making tasting flight boards out of timber with 5 recessed 62.5mm diameter pockets at 2.5mm deep.

All the other cuts seem to come out accurate: slot, profile cut, but the circular pockets are coming out with a diameter of about 58mm instead of 62.5mm.

 

I'm using a 3.17mm flat endmill, and that's selected as the tool.

When I go into the sketch or inspect, and double check the measurements, the circular path has the correct 62.5mm diameter.

 

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

Also, I've noticed in the tool settings the "tool diameter offset" is set to "1"

What does that mean?

 

Screenshots below showing settings, paths etc, and the f3d file is attached

 

 

ss1.png

 

ss2.png

 

ss3.png

 

ss4.png

 

ss5.png

 

ss6.png

7 REPLIES 7
Message 2 of 8
macmanpb
in reply to: joeldbutler

Hi joeldbutler,

 

what are the values in "Stock to leave" section?

 

stocktoleave.png

Message 3 of 8
joeldbutler
in reply to: macmanpb

I had it set at 0.02mm
I just deleted all the tool paths and redid them, seems to work fine now. I must have ticked something I shouldn't have, but couldn't find what it was.
Message 4 of 8
HughesTooling
in reply to: joeldbutler


@joeldbutler wrote:

I'm having an issue with circular pockets not cutting to the correct diameter.

 

I'm making tasting flight boards out of timber with 5 recessed 62.5mm diameter pockets at 2.5mm deep.

All the other cuts seem to come out accurate: slot, profile cut, but the circular pockets are coming out with a diameter of about 58mm instead of 62.5mm.

 

I'm using a 3.17mm flat endmill, and that's selected as the tool.

When I go into the sketch or inspect, and double check the measurements, the circular path has the correct 62.5mm diameter.

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?


 

 When you say it's coming out about 58mm is that the cut size or the size you see in the G code.

Here's a screen grab of a back plot of one of you pockets.

Capture5.PNG

 

It shows a radius of 29.613 so 29.613 x 2 + 3.17 = 62.396, you have a stock to leave of 0.05 per side so add that gives 62.496 so the code is pretty much correct!

Here's your stock to leave settings, you should set the smoothing to 0.01 to match your tolerance to get better arc fitting.

Clipboard02.png

 

 

Also, I've noticed in the tool settings the "tool diameter offset" is set to "1"

What does that mean?

 

 

 Your machine should have a tool library where you set the tool length offsets and diameters so in the g code T1 will load tool number 1 length and diameter offsets,

 

Mark.

Mark Hughes
Owner, Hughes Tooling
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature


Message 5 of 8
joeldbutler
in reply to: HughesTooling

Hi Mark, what I meant was what does tool offset mean?
Message 6 of 8
HughesTooling
in reply to: joeldbutler

It's just the tool number in the library. When you create tools in Fusion they have a number, you can change the number if need to match the tool library in your machine control.

In your file you have 2 tool tool #1 and #2 you need to match those tools in the library on your control, the tool offset is just to call the correct tool for the operation..

Capture5.PNG

 

Mark

Mark Hughes
Owner, Hughes Tooling
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature


Message 7 of 8
joeldbutler
in reply to: HughesTooling

Ah OK thanks Mark
Message 8 of 8
Dreistein75
in reply to: joeldbutler

I realize that this post is dated 2016, however if you by chance still read this: I have the very same problem except recalculating the tool paths does not solve it. Have you figured out the reason back in the days? 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report