You guys both had great ideas, thanks a lot!
@Drewpan wrote:
There are software tools on the net that will create the shape from the formula that you can then save as an svg file. You can then import the svg and extrude from that. Depending upon what precision you need you should be able to scale the svg to the size you want. If you need great accuracy then you might have to do the suggested Inventor method from the previous post.
This is an interesting one I didn't consider at all. As you noted, the accuracy wasn't near what I needed, but it did work; I used Desmos graphing calculator to graph the polar version of the function: (Note I had to swap "c" for "e" because e returned a constant; I couldn't use a slider value. By the way, this function and other modified functions came from a paper I found discussing these polygons: see here).


Then I exported it using the "Share Graph" button and Export Image as SVG, then imported it to Fusion as a Sketch to be extruded. The problem was the SVG came in as pretty long linear segments. So I had to fall back on using inventor.
Thanks @a.laasW8M6T for linking to the instruction on how to create a equation curve. In Inventor, I used these following equations from the same paper mentioned earlier to create a 2D equation driven curve in parametric cartesian mode:
x(t): (( Dm / 2 ul ) - e * cos(1 deg * 3 ul * t)) * cos(t) - 3 ul * e * sin(1 deg * 3 ul * t) * sin(1deg * t)
y(t): (( Dm / 2 ul ) - e * cos(1 deg * 3 ul * t)) * sin(t) + 3 ul * e * sin(1 deg * 3 ul * t) * cos(1deg * t)

I was able to export the sketch as a dxf and import into Fusion for extrusion. I used Flex tokens to access Inventor; $24 is a bit steep for a single curve, so I exported curves for each PSC variant. They are attached below, along with my Inventor part file, if anyone would like to use them.
@a.laasW8M6T wrote:
Do you actually NEED to model it in Fusion?
You can just download a C4 Blank from a tooling supplier like Iscar, and then do additional modelling if you are trying to create a custom toolholder
I need a female version of the interface. So potentially, if I was good at surface modelling, I could've found the curve that lay at the intersection of the tapered surface and flange surface, which would have maybe been the nominal curve, then re-extruded it to get the receiver form. The receivers have a slightly different taper to them (Shank: 1° 26' 21"; Reciever: 1° 25' 31") so the actual surface of the tool shank model provided by Iscar or other manufacturers wouldn't match the receiver surface.
Thank you both for your ideas!