@0502880 wrote:
Still I feel, that there could be some development work to do with timeline, that's just my tought.
Trippy's R.U.L.E #1 is definitely a good one to follow, but I would also agree that the timeline could use a bit more work around how it's implemented and used. Part of the problem with the timeline is that it's not very efficient from a visualization perspective, because it's a line. Traditional history based CAD programs (like Solidworks) do essentially the same thing with the feature tree on the left side, but with SWX when you create a feature from a sketch that sketch is then grouped with the created feature. If a sketch is used for multiple features a virtual copy of (not really copy but more like a link to) the sketch is grouped with each feature. This makes it a bit easier to find a features' associated sketch for editing. Fusion doesn't do this and just lists everything in linear order of creation, which makes for really long and disorderly looking timelines. You can create groups if you want but it's a manual process that puts more burden on the user to manage it. Even just a simple grouping of features to base sketches could reduce the timeline length significantly.
I really wish that Fusion would incorporate a second dimension to the timeline somehow. Admittedly I don't do much modelling in Fusion so I don't have a clear idea of how this might work and the impact it would have. But I really do think a more advanced timeline could be quite a useful.
C|