- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Hi,
I am new to Fusion 360 (potentially switching from SolidWorks) so forgive me if I'm missing something obvious. I know Fusion 360 doesn't do configurations the way SolidWorks does. That's OK. Here's my problem. In Solidworks I typically use multiple configurations that track the item through the manufacturing process. That usually starts with a 3D print. The 3D Print is then used as a pattern for investment casting. Then the investment casting is post machined for dimensionally critical surfaces. So I start with the "final part" configuration and work back through the manufacturing process. The "final part" configuration is used in assembly files that use the final part. The "as-cast" configuration gets a little extra meat in areas that will be cleaned up by the final machining operation. The "pattern" configuration builds on the "as-cast" configuration by scaling up to account for shrinkage, gets sprues added, and maybe duplicates copies of the part on the same sprue that will get cast at the same time. The "print" configuration builds on the "pattern" configuration (maybe even more multiple copies) to add supports necessary for reliable 3D printing that will be torn away after the item comes off the printer.
Now, if I'm working with an assembly with the "final part" configuration and discover that I need a slight modification there, I just edit the part there (only once). That change automatically propagates all the way back to the "print" configuration which typically has multiple copies plus miscellaneous features to account for the full manufacturing process.
At this point, I see no way to do anything close to this in Fusion 360. Initially, I thought I could just create individual Fusion 360 files that each represent one of those Solidworks configurations and each include a linked component representing the previous step in the chain. Problem is I can't add features to these linked components without changing the item I'm linking to. For example, I want the "pattern" version to be scale up to account for shrinkage. How do I do that without also scaling up the "as-cast" version? I could make an unlinked copy, but then if I add a fillet (etc) to the "final" version, I will need to add that same fillet in every unlinked copy. So once I decided that wasn't going to work, I figured I could use the nifty branch/merge feature for this. Turns out that whole system is going away.
Is there anyway to accomplish what I need here? Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Frank
Solved! Go to Solution.