For me it's frustrating because I'll want all the components to be linked for Bill of Material purposes, but then I'll get a good amount into the dwg and realize I need to do something unique to one of the components or more. My immediate response is, "no problem, there must be an easy way to just unlink these things"
And here we are. It's just another step in "thinking ahead" that I have to make before I actually know what the final design is going to look like.
If I go with Paste->New from here on out, my BOM will be screwy because I'll have multiple PN's (or multipe Balloons, at the least) for literally the same part if I don't end up needing any unique modifications. It doesn't look very professional to have a BOM Table that keeps calling out Qty 1 for the same PN 5 times. (Then again, the 2D drawings and BOM tables on this software aren't super pro looking anyway... but another topic for another day)
The solution isn't to force the user to either select Paste->New or Paste. The solution is to give the user the option to link and unlink components for both modeling reasons and BOM reasons. Having not fixed this in 5 years makes me believe there is some core problem with making a solution...
Anyway, I'm starting to make enough money that I'm crossing my fingers it won't be long until I / my company gets Solidworks. Sorry to be a Debby Downer... I am starting to enjoy this software more and more. Does Solidworks have the same issue? I'll have to check it out.... Maybe it's completely different.
Does this issue come up when the user decides not to use the timeline?
Cheers,