Implementing Conditional Path Access Based on AGV Load State and Station Occupancy

Implementing Conditional Path Access Based on AGV Load State and Station Occupancy

hbg485
Contributor Contributor
118 Views
2 Replies
Message 1 of 3

Implementing Conditional Path Access Based on AGV Load State and Station Occupancy

hbg485
Contributor
Contributor

Hello, I would like to ask for guidance regarding a routing constraint in my current AGV model.

In this scenario, adding new paths is not an option, so I need to handle route permissions using the existing paths only.

The intended logic is as follows:

  • If the AGV is empty, it should always be allowed to pass under the station, regardless of whether an item is present on the station.

  • If the AGV is loaded and the station has an item, the AGV should not be allowed to use the under-station path and must instead take the lower bypass path.

  • If the AGV is loaded but the station has no item, the AGV should still be permitted to pass under the station.

I would like to confirm whether such conditional path access can be implemented strictly using the existing path network, without adding new paths.
If so, I would greatly appreciate any recommendations on how to structure this logic, or which triggers/delegates would be most appropriate.

Thank you in advance for your support.

hbg485_0-1765411342093.png

 

@moehlmann_fe 

0 Likes
119 Views
2 Replies
Replies (2)
Message 2 of 3

moehlmann_fe
Advocate
Advocate

You can add a control point for each storage location and dynamically change its routing constraint when a vehicle starts a travel task. Check out the KIVA demo model for an example. https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/flexsim-knowledge-base/kiva-system-demo-model/ta-p/13520232

0 Likes
Message 3 of 3

hbg485
Contributor
Contributor

I attempted to implement this based on the post you shared.
However, managing deadlock avoidance under different scenarios has proven to be difficult given my current level of experience.
I would sincerely appreciate any advice or suggestions you may have.

 

@moehlmann_fe 

0 Likes