Lookup Action textfield

[thomas_schluesselberger]

Hi,

maybe someone can help me out.

I want to have an lookup action where i have multible different choices to pick from.

And i want a title block within a normal text (no multiline text) and the name of the lookup action should always be in the text. 

So i can switch from different names from the lookup action.

So as example (see picture) i want to be able to switch with my lookup action from "1" to "2".

I want it to work just like a visiblity state. But i need it to work with a normal text not an attribute.

[h_s_walker]

You have no variables in the left hand side. If there are no variables there the lookup will not work

[thomas_schluesselberger]

Ok, thanks for the info.

But still, i don't know how to get the lookup-name (in the picture "1" and "2") into my text

[Libbya]

Why does it need to be text rather than an attribute.

Post your block.

[h_s_walker]

I don't think you can add the lookup "text" into a field. I may be wrong

[Libbya]

You can use a blockplaceholder field within an attribute to reference the lookup text.  I am not sure if you can use a field within text, though.  Those are the reasons I both asked why they need it to be text instead of an attribute and also asked that they post the block.  

[thomas_schluesselberger]

Hi,

thanks for your answers.

I attached you my block.

The attributes PLANSTATUS and PLANSTATUS1 are my problem. 

I have 4 visibility states and there are two different widhts. 

I don't really want two attributes, but i need it to be two because at the smaller widht the text must be further together.

So now when i have one of the "Faltrand-Breite - XXX" visiblity states active, i see the "PLANSTATUS1" attribute.

But i don't want to be able to see this attribute (also not "PLANSTATUS" attribute in the other visibility states), i just wanna edit it with my blockpropertytable (or some other sort of lookup action).

[Libbya]

The only issue is that the attribute is listed on the properties palette?

[thomas_schluesselberger]

Well, if you say it like that, it sounds pretty dumb 😂

But yeah, i don't like the workaround here and i would like a cleaner looking option to do this.

That's the reason i asked if it's possible with an text + textfield. But sadly not possible.