There are lots of approaches to this challenge. All of them have pros and cons.
One approach we use is to create what I call a correlation file. It is an empty drawing with the architectural drawings attached as XREF's using the ATTACH option. The drawings are scaled, moved and rotated to fit the civil site. Since they are just XREF's they retain the source information provided by the architect intact. You can also attach civil drawings as needed to help with aligning the arch drawings. As long as they are attached using the OVERLAY option, they will not create conflicts when the drawing is xref'd downstream.
This correlation drawing is then attached to the civil drawings as needed. Since all the transformations have been done in the correlation drawing they always come into the civil drawings in the right place.
If the architect sends updates, the paths to them are easily redirected to the new drawings in the correlation drawing and everything downstream gets the updates. This is also a way to keep the civil drawings clean of all the non standard layers, styles and symbols that come from outside sources. No need to go through them to clean out the old data when you get updates.
Some of the downsides to this approach are due to the lack of good practices by the architects some cases. They are notorious for using layer 0 and using color and linetype overrides to make their drawings look the way they like. This makes it impossible to use their drawings in XREFs without modification. Also they often will move their buildings around in their drawings so they have to be re-aligned when you get their updates. There are some firms that understand these issues and are good about their practices which makes them easy to work with. Hopefully you get to work with those types.
Neil Wilson (a.k.a. neilw)
AEC Collection/C3D 2024, LDT 2004, Power Civil v8i SS1
WIN 10 64 PRO
http://www.sec-landmgt.com