Community
Civil 3D Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Civil 3D Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD Civil 3D topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Adding a Path to an arc in Part Builder

17 REPLIES 17
Reply
Message 1 of 18
Anonymous
1521 Views, 17 Replies

Adding a Path to an arc in Part Builder

Anonymous
Not applicable

I am trying to create a new part in part builder but can not add a path to an arc geometry. Does somebody know why?

0 Likes

Adding a Path to an arc in Part Builder

I am trying to create a new part in part builder but can not add a path to an arc geometry. Does somebody know why?

17 REPLIES 17
Message 2 of 18
cyndycyndycyndy
in reply to: Anonymous

cyndycyndycyndy
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I can't tell you why but it doesn't seem to want to create that sweep anymore. It creates it in the Content Explorer but doen't draw it.  Not too handy when you have nothing to select to join all your solids up.  i'm not sure what you are building but I was building a clean-out.  My work-around was to use a straight segment instead to represent the 45 degree bend.

Cyndy Davenport
Civil BIM Professional & Enthusiast
Contributing Author to Mastering Civil 3D
Decades of Experience

I can't tell you why but it doesn't seem to want to create that sweep anymore. It creates it in the Content Explorer but doen't draw it.  Not too handy when you have nothing to select to join all your solids up.  i'm not sure what you are building but I was building a clean-out.  My work-around was to use a straight segment instead to represent the 45 degree bend.

Cyndy Davenport
Civil BIM Professional & Enthusiast
Contributing Author to Mastering Civil 3D
Decades of Experience
Message 3 of 18
sirjoelsph
in reply to: Anonymous

sirjoelsph
Collaborator
Collaborator

I know it's possible based on this tutorial that I reference a lot when working in Part Builder.

 

http://www.civil4d.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/no233a.PDF

 

Check out Part 3 - Step 6 for where they use an arc for a path.

-JOEL
0 Likes

I know it's possible based on this tutorial that I reference a lot when working in Part Builder.

 

http://www.civil4d.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/no233a.PDF

 

Check out Part 3 - Step 6 for where they use an arc for a path.

-JOEL
Message 4 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: sirjoelsph

Anonymous
Not applicable

Have you tried it lately?  That document is dated back to 2007.  I know it worked back then.  It's not doing it now.

0 Likes

Have you tried it lately?  That document is dated back to 2007.  I know it worked back then.  It's not doing it now.

Message 5 of 18
sirjoelsph
in reply to: Anonymous

sirjoelsph
Collaborator
Collaborator

I haven't specifically tried to path an arc lately, but I've done a lot of custom Part Builder work in C3D 2014.  I know there are some issues in 2015 and I haven't fully tested 2016 yet.  If you could, post your files so we could have a look.

-JOEL
0 Likes

I haven't specifically tried to path an arc lately, but I've done a lot of custom Part Builder work in C3D 2014.  I know there are some issues in 2015 and I haven't fully tested 2016 yet.  If you could, post your files so we could have a look.

-JOEL
Message 6 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: sirjoelsph

Anonymous
Not applicable

I've built a lot of custom parts myself.  In fact, I taught a class on Part Builder in 2010.  You could sweep down an arc's path back then.

 

Cyndy Davenport

0 Likes

I've built a lot of custom parts myself.  In fact, I taught a class on Part Builder in 2010.  You could sweep down an arc's path back then.

 

Cyndy Davenport

Message 7 of 18
MikeEvansUK
in reply to: Anonymous

MikeEvansUK
Advisor
Advisor

Agreed, using an Arc to sweep seemed to work right up to R2013 but it now appears to be broken in 2015 (didn't actually ever use 2014 for much so can't comment).

 

I have parts created in R2013 which work fine but are now broken in 2015.

 

I think this is a bug as I believe there were some problems fixed in the part builder calcalator etc in the 2015 Service pack 2, looks like something got tripped up.

 

Below screenshot, Left Civil3d 2013 (Sp2) Right Civil3d 2015 (Sp2) same parts but no sweep in 2015.

 

2015-04-17 15_10_08-Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D 2015 - [ProposedDrainage.dwg - Read Only].jpg

 

M

Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

0 Likes

Agreed, using an Arc to sweep seemed to work right up to R2013 but it now appears to be broken in 2015 (didn't actually ever use 2014 for much so can't comment).

 

I have parts created in R2013 which work fine but are now broken in 2015.

 

I think this is a bug as I believe there were some problems fixed in the part builder calcalator etc in the 2015 Service pack 2, looks like something got tripped up.

 

Below screenshot, Left Civil3d 2013 (Sp2) Right Civil3d 2015 (Sp2) same parts but no sweep in 2015.

 

2015-04-17 15_10_08-Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D 2015 - [ProposedDrainage.dwg - Read Only].jpg

 

M

Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

Message 8 of 18
MikeEvansUK
in reply to: MikeEvansUK

MikeEvansUK
Advisor
Advisor
Issued a support request will follow with more information as received.

Case ID: 10657437.
Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

0 Likes

Issued a support request will follow with more information as received.

Case ID: 10657437.
Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

Message 9 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: MikeEvansUK

Anonymous
Not applicable

any new development on this?

It seems to still be an issue in 2016.

 

0 Likes

any new development on this?

It seems to still be an issue in 2016.

 

Message 10 of 18
BrianHailey
in reply to: Anonymous

BrianHailey
Mentor
Mentor

There's functionality that worked in 2009, broken in 2010, and is still broken. When I was doing a lot of work in part builder, I had to keep a version of Civil 3D 2009 on my computer for just that functionality.

 

You should check out Project Kameleon. It's technology that has the potential to replace part builder.

Brian J. Hailey, P.E.



GEI Consultants
My Civil 3D Blog

0 Likes

There's functionality that worked in 2009, broken in 2010, and is still broken. When I was doing a lot of work in part builder, I had to keep a version of Civil 3D 2009 on my computer for just that functionality.

 

You should check out Project Kameleon. It's technology that has the potential to replace part builder.

Brian J. Hailey, P.E.



GEI Consultants
My Civil 3D Blog

Message 11 of 18
MikeEvansUK
in reply to: Anonymous

MikeEvansUK
Advisor
Advisor

No new news really.

 

The case was closed and handed to the Devlopment team. I hadn't looked at R2016 (not installed at work yet). I expected it to be a problem in R2016 as well (due to RC being out when bug found) so didn't bother looking.

 

Hope it's fixed soon it's holding me back from using R2015 and now seemingly R2016, Still working with R2013 here which works correctly, hence how I found the bug. Transfering my parts from 13 to 15. It's going to be hard for my Employer to validate paying out for software we can't use (Three versions now).

 

M.

Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

0 Likes

No new news really.

 

The case was closed and handed to the Devlopment team. I hadn't looked at R2016 (not installed at work yet). I expected it to be a problem in R2016 as well (due to RC being out when bug found) so didn't bother looking.

 

Hope it's fixed soon it's holding me back from using R2015 and now seemingly R2016, Still working with R2013 here which works correctly, hence how I found the bug. Transfering my parts from 13 to 15. It's going to be hard for my Employer to validate paying out for software we can't use (Three versions now).

 

M.

Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

Message 12 of 18
MikeEvansUK
in reply to: BrianHailey

MikeEvansUK
Advisor
Advisor

Brian, I have been looking at PK but can't really say any more. It's geared more for the Dark side of Civil design (Infra Works) and not for a true design package.

 

As I said erlier, as it's a Beta I wouldn't use it in any live projects just yet.

 

Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

0 Likes

Brian, I have been looking at PK but can't really say any more. It's geared more for the Dark side of Civil design (Infra Works) and not for a true design package.

 

As I said erlier, as it's a Beta I wouldn't use it in any live projects just yet.

 

Mike Evans

Civil3D 2022 English
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), ~4.0GHz With 32768MB RAM, AMD FirePro V4900, Dedicated Memory: 984 MB, Shared Memory: 814 MB

Message 13 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: MikeEvansUK

Anonymous
Not applicable

lol "Dark side of Civil design (Infra Works)"

this is what they are building for the next update.

final.png

 

that whole discussion C3D Infraworks is more star trek than star war.

" resistance is futile, you will be assimilated "

 

0 Likes

lol "Dark side of Civil design (Infra Works)"

this is what they are building for the next update.

final.png

 

that whole discussion C3D Infraworks is more star trek than star war.

" resistance is futile, you will be assimilated "

 

Message 14 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Anonymous
Not applicable

I hoping this issue works in 2018, I am trying to create a cleanout with a wye and a 1/8 bend that need an arc but in 2014-2016 you cannot create the path modifier to create the solid has any body been able to create this in part builder for 2018?

I hoping this issue works in 2018, I am trying to create a cleanout with a wye and a 1/8 bend that need an arc but in 2014-2016 you cannot create the path modifier to create the solid has any body been able to create this in part builder for 2018?

Message 15 of 18
BrianHailey
in reply to: Anonymous

BrianHailey
Mentor
Mentor

I haven't tried it but I wouldn't hold my breath for it. There were things that worked in 2009 that were broken in 2010 that are still broken.

 

Project Kameleon has graduated from Labs and is a full fledged program now. It is installed with InfraWorks. There's supposed to be a connection to Civil 3D to allow the Kameleon parts to be imported into Civil 3D but I'm not positive that's been implemented yet.

Brian J. Hailey, P.E.



GEI Consultants
My Civil 3D Blog

0 Likes

I haven't tried it but I wouldn't hold my breath for it. There were things that worked in 2009 that were broken in 2010 that are still broken.

 

Project Kameleon has graduated from Labs and is a full fledged program now. It is installed with InfraWorks. There's supposed to be a connection to Civil 3D to allow the Kameleon parts to be imported into Civil 3D but I'm not positive that's been implemented yet.

Brian J. Hailey, P.E.



GEI Consultants
My Civil 3D Blog

Message 16 of 18
Marsay
in reply to: Anonymous

Marsay
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Still a problem in C3D 2018.

Still a problem in C3D 2018.

Message 17 of 18
Coffee_Aided_Design
in reply to: Anonymous

Coffee_Aided_Design
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I'm going through the part builder tutorial in Civil 3D 2020 and this problem does indeed still exist.

0 Likes

I'm going through the part builder tutorial in Civil 3D 2020 and this problem does indeed still exist.

Message 18 of 18

andy.zheng3KA27
Community Visitor
Community Visitor

Using Civil 3D 2023 and this is still an issue.

0 Likes

Using Civil 3D 2023 and this is still an issue.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Rail Community


Autodesk Design & Make Report