Traveling Tangent Lines

[Anonymous]

This may be an easy fix but it's been difficult Googling exactly what I'm looking for. I guess the best way I can describe my issue is with an example. Let's say I constrain a line tangent to a circle. If I grab the two objects and move them, the line will stay tangent but it will travel off to one side or another. The circle will go to wherever I move it to. I hope that makes sense. Is there a way to keep that where it is and not fly off and do it's own thing?

[Anonymous]

This may be an easy fix but it's been difficult Googling exactly what I'm looking for. I guess the best way I can describe my issue is with an example. Let's say I constrain a line tangent to a circle. If I grab the two objects and move them, the line will stay tangent but it will travel off to one side or another. The circle will go to wherever I move it to. I hope that makes sense. Is there a way to keep that where it is and not fly off and do it's own thing?

[imadHabash]

Hi and Welcome,

maybe if you fix object by using GCFIX command line will help.

[imadHabash]

Hi and Welcome,

maybe if you fix object by using GCFIX command line will help.

[Anonymous]

That seems to fix the object where it is in model space. I would basically like to fix them together. Good start but I would still need to be able to move the items.

[Anonymous]

That seems to fix the object where it is in model space. I would basically like to fix them together. Good start but I would still need to be able to move the items.

[imadHabash]

Hi,

you can get it by adding another parametric option called HORIZONTAL ( see attached ) there you can move both together.

Good Luck...

[imadHabash]

Hi,

you can get it by adding another parametric option called HORIZONTAL ( see attached ) there you can move both together.

Good Luck...

[JDMather]

It sounds to me like you also need a coincident constraint between the line endpoint and the circle.

I have found that the easiest way to get a Coincident to a circle is to use the Nearest osnap.

[JDMather]

It sounds to me like you also need a coincident constraint between the line endpoint and the circle.

I have found that the easiest way to get a Coincident to a circle is to use the Nearest osnap.

[JDMather]

---

@imadHabash wrote:

Hi,

you can get it by adding another parametric option called HORIZONTAL ( see attached ) there you can move both together....

---

What if you don't want the line constrained to Horizontal?  I think you still need a Coincident, even if you do.

[JDMather]

---

@imadHabash wrote:

Hi,

you can get it by adding another parametric option called HORIZONTAL ( see attached ) there you can move both together....

---

What if you don't want the line constrained to Horizontal?  I think you still need a Coincident, even if you do.

[Anonymous]

The coincident constraint works, so thank you for that! I guess I was just looking for a global solution, so it would know to not travel automatically. Like a inferred constraint, I suppose. But CONSTRAINTINFER doesn't fix the problem. So for now I will use coincident as a hotfix! Thank you again.

[Anonymous]

The coincident constraint works, so thank you for that! I guess I was just looking for a global solution, so it would know to not travel automatically. Like a inferred constraint, I suppose. But CONSTRAINTINFER doesn't fix the problem. So for now I will use coincident as a hotfix! Thank you again.

[JDMather]

Inferred coincident constraint is automatic if you use Nearest osnap.  Did you watch the video?  Do you see me adding any coincident constraints?  AutoCAD does it for me automatically.

[JDMather]

Inferred coincident constraint is automatic if you use Nearest osnap.  Did you watch the video?  Do you see me adding any coincident constraints?  AutoCAD does it for me automatically.