I moved to this brand new architectural company and 3 different co-workers taught me these 3 different things in setting up Dimstyle. Do we do it right?
1. I use scale 1:1 on my model but when it comes to set up the Dimstyle first I have to figure out what scale I am going to use on my viewport. For instance, if I choose to use scale 3/8" = 1'-0 on my viewport then on the Text tab I have to create 3" height on text style.
Sometimes when I miss my judgment on choosing the scale for my viewport window I have to create a new style on the dimstyle with different text style to serve its text height.
Is there a way to set one style on the dimstyle that works for all viewport scales?
2. I use the 'Use overall scale of' on Fit tab by in putting 32 for the scale factor & leave the text style on 0'-0" but this way does not help me of avoiding to create too many different styles on the Dimstyle either.
3. I check the 'Annotative' on Fit tab & create several scale in Annotative Object Scale. This way I only need to have one style on the dimstyle.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by dbroad. Go to Solution.
Ultimately you'll have to come to an agreement with your coworkers. There are two basic approaches for annotating in model space.
OLD STYLE: (More work to manage but fewer visibility surprises. Lot's of effort to change scales.)
NEW STYLE (Less calculating and possibly reuse of annotations. Can cause visibility surprises when model annotation scale and paper viewport annotation scale vary.)
There are lots of other awful dimstyle hacks like keeping dimscale set to 1 and calculating the size of every other feature by multiplying model scale factor by the plotted height. I'd rather let those people go rather than deal with their mess.
Some users like to do all annotation in paper space but I don't think that is feasible with AutoCAD Architecture.
I use annotative scaling and keep a sharp eye out for missing annotation and annotation that is an incorrect size.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.