cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Easier use of cameras

Easier use of cameras

Having used Advance Steel for 16 years, before cameras were functional enough to be useful, I got very quick at creating GA drawings by just creating views based on the UCS.

 

I keep giving cameras a go as they have the benefit of being able to modify the view window after drawing creation, but I still find them quite time consuming to set up compared to just creating views on the UCS, either with full extents or picking 2 points for the view window.

 

...so to make cameras easier to use I suggest the following:

 

1.  With a fixed XY viewport, when grip editing, it moves the opposite side as well, keeping the centre in place.  I find this far from ideal and just want to be able to grip edit one side and the other stay where it is.  This would make it far easier to define the window you want.

 

2.  Multi Edit - if you want to change the drawing style for multiple cameras, a multi edit does not work and only changes one of them.  Multi edit capability would be useful.

 

3.  Change Drawing style - if you change the drawing style associated with the camera, it does not affect an existing drawing view - you have to delete and re-create the drawing (or manually apply new style from within drawing using the DSM).  Auto update of the view to a newly selected drawing style would be better.

 

4.  Duplicates - once drawing views of cameras have been created, it should not be possible to create them again (via an MT default?).  This would make it easier to create any missing views etc.

 

5.  Grouping - it makes sense to create GA drawings in a logical way such as plans, then elevations, sections etc.  Whilst there are several types of camera available, a few more types would be useful.

 

6.  Draw order - the drawing views seem to be created in order that the cameras were created.  Some way to set a specific draw order (so relevant views get placed on same drawing) would be useful.

 

7.  Mirror - it would be usefult to mirror a camera for a view the opposite end of a building.  However this results in the camera being upside down!  I know a copy rotate will work, but the ability to mirror would be good.

 

8.  User Attributes - when you have many cameras, they get difficult to see which is which.  At least one user attribute field (plus any other new fields for the above functionality) that could be used in the Search & Mark Objects tool would make it much easier to find certain cameras to edit or create drawings from.

 

 

13 Comments
haedicu
Alumni
Status changed to: Under Review
 
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi Drawtech,

 

Agree with all you comments/observations above.

 

I would also like to see a 'GRIP' introduced on the camera object at the insertion point which would allow it's easy relocation. Failing this, at least the ability to be able to snap to the insertion point using OSNAP.

 

Cheers

 

Geoff.

Drawtech
Collaborator

@Anonymous

Good idea Geoff.  🙂

 

Udo, please add this to the list of requirements.

iwafb
Advisor

Some great ideas!

 

Additonally, there should be an option to save multiple view directions to the one camera so we don't have to overlap all the time!

 

Thanks,

Dart

Shawton2000
Contributor

 

Couldn’t agree more.  Camera grips definitely need a look at, I have said similar things on other camera idea posts.

Together with this idea  
we have about 60 votes, should be seen...
But additional to your idea (maybe you already know it), there's a good Autodesk university Article from @johnjmbennett  for the "secrets" behind the cameras. I think this is the second time he made this and it will  shown how you could add additional camera types--> click here

 

rbarbosa8DQGJ
Advocate

Make the viewport and camera work correctly in ADST and Autocad. There is no way to plot hidden lines in an applied visualization style to generate viewports in the paperspace. The dashed lines are printed as continuous lines. Issuing 2D design on models that have plates and beams generated in ADST and also imported 3D solids is difficult because the viewport fails. Using the Flatshot command is bad because it breaks the link with the smart model and makes the BIM process more difficult. In addition, flatshot makes the file very heavy (in bytes) and Autocad slow for the customer to see the drawing.

DumitruBerteanu
Community Manager
Status changed to: Accepted
 
DumitruBerteanu
Community Manager
Status changed to: Accepted
 
bigcarl5000kg
Advisor

@Drawtech ,

 

Happy Christmas 😁😁😁

DumitruBerteanu
Community Manager
Status changed to: Implemented
 
DumitruBerteanu
Community Manager
Status changed to: Implemented
 
bigcarl5000kg
Advisor

great 👍👍👍👍

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea