ANZ Bridging

[Anonymous]

I'm having a couple of problems with the ANZ Bridging. 

1. When in the naming table when I select the first bridging it highlights the bridging items at both ends of the bridging runs.

Also, The holes on the fascia purlin are in the wrong plane. If I select "Layout by Lower Purlin" it fixes the fascia purlin but moves all the holes in the other purlins into the wrong plane. 

Any ideas, or are these bugs? Thanks.

[Anonymous]

I'm having a couple of problems with the ANZ Bridging. 

1. When in the naming table when I select the first bridging it highlights the bridging items at both ends of the bridging runs.

Also, The holes on the fascia purlin are in the wrong plane. If I select "Layout by Lower Purlin" it fixes the fascia purlin but moves all the holes in the other purlins into the wrong plane. 

Any ideas, or are these bugs? Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Stephan?

[Anonymous]

Stephan?

[stephan.gumpert]

Hi,

I can not comment about the highlighting of the bridging.  In principal only the row that you select should highlight.

In regards to the holes, is the purlin in the picture kick over or is it aligned with the roof?  (Hard to tell from the image)

Stephan

[stephan.gumpert]

Hi,

I can not comment about the highlighting of the bridging.  In principal only the row that you select should highlight.

In regards to the holes, is the purlin in the picture kick over or is it aligned with the roof?  (Hard to tell from the image)

Stephan

[Anonymous]

Hello Stephan,

The pulin in the picture is a fascia purlin and therefore is vertical. All the other purlins are aligned perpendicular to the roof rafters. Note that if I set the holes to align with the bottom purlin all the other holes go to a vertical alignment. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Hello Stephan,

The pulin in the picture is a fascia purlin and therefore is vertical. All the other purlins are aligned perpendicular to the roof rafters. Note that if I set the holes to align with the bottom purlin all the other holes go to a vertical alignment. Thanks.

[stephan.gumpert · Accepted solution]

John,

The drilling is working as designed.  A current limitation.

• The workaround for this would be to do only bridging to the second last purlin.
• Copy down the last Bridge.
• Use the Extend / Trim command from the Adv Steel Tool palette so that the system line extends to the face of the fascia purlin.  (The reporting is done on the system line length)
• Then change the CommCode field in the modelled bridge.
• And of cause drill the holes in the Fascia purlin

Incase you have not seen my articles on bridging below is the link.

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/community/collection/25051?preview

Let me see what I can do to get this fixed.

I'll investigate the highlighting too.

Thanks

Stephan

[stephan.gumpert · Accepted solution]

John,

The drilling is working as designed.  A current limitation.

• The workaround for this would be to do only bridging to the second last purlin.
• Copy down the last Bridge.
• Use the Extend / Trim command from the Adv Steel Tool palette so that the system line extends to the face of the fascia purlin.  (The reporting is done on the system line length)
• Then change the CommCode field in the modelled bridge.
• And of cause drill the holes in the Fascia purlin

Incase you have not seen my articles on bridging below is the link.

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/community/collection/25051?preview

Let me see what I can do to get this fixed.

I'll investigate the highlighting too.

Thanks

Stephan

[Anonymous]

Thanks Stephan,

I will use your workaround for now. Hopefully this will be fixed in the next hotfix or release of AS. This bridging macro is an excellent tool.

John.

[Anonymous]

Thanks Stephan,

I will use your workaround for now. Hopefully this will be fixed in the next hotfix or release of AS. This bridging macro is an excellent tool.

John.

[iwafb]

Following up on Stewart's comment, also hoping this can be incorporated. I'm sure @stephan.gumpert is equal to the challenge!

It would be really good if ridge struts could be introduced as well...

Cheers,

Dart

[iwafb]

Following up on Stewart's comment, also hoping this can be incorporated. I'm sure @stephan.gumpert is equal to the challenge!

It would be really good if ridge struts could be introduced as well...

Cheers,

Dart

[Anonymous]

iwafb,

Yes I agree!

John Stewart

[Anonymous]

iwafb,

Yes I agree!

John Stewart

[Flies-Eyes]

Is anybody aware if this bridging limitation was ever addressed by the software vendor?

Is it true that the bridging macro is only suitable for the internal purlins and the bridging element for the fascia beam remain a manual modelling exercise?

[Flies-Eyes]

Is anybody aware if this bridging limitation was ever addressed by the software vendor?

Is it true that the bridging macro is only suitable for the internal purlins and the bridging element for the fascia beam remain a manual modelling exercise?