Just like with Pipes and Ducts, before Revit 2027,  I would like to see an option to create/suggest the layout for Electrical Conduits within an Electrical Circuit.  Now we only have the option to show the 'Path' (farthest or All devices) but not in combination with the actual Conduits to be drawn in the Model. We need Dynamo to covert the Path to Conduits. For Air Terminals and so on there is the option to create a 'Duct/Pipe system' but not for Conduits on which the Layout function is based.   Unfortunately this function (Layout) has been removed for Pipes and Ducts also in the 2027 version. Please bring it back and expand it with the Conduits. Show More

Bonjour a tous,   Voici une proposition pour REVIT    Configuration des règles de nommage pour les exports   Pour les fichiers PDF Ajouter la possibilité de configurer des règles de nommage personnalisées pour les exports PDF, notamment lorsqu’on souhaite regrouper plusieurs feuilles en un seul fichier PDF. Pour les fichiers DWG Permettre la configuration de règles de nommage pour les exports DWG, afin de garantir une cohérence totale entre les noms de fichiers générés pour les exports PDF et DWG.   Naming Rule Configuration for Exports For PDF Files Add the ability to configure custom naming rules for PDF exports, especially when combining multiple sheets into a single PDF file. For DWG Files Enable the configuration of naming rules for DWG exports to ensure full consistency between the filenames generated for PDF and DWG exports. Show More

Bonjour a tous,   Voici une proposition pour REVIT    Amélioration de l’outil Limite de Propriété Visualisation 3D Rendre l’outil Limite de Propriété visible en 3D, notamment lors de la création de coupes ou d’autres vues, pour une meilleure intégration dans le workflow de modélisation. Typologie des reculs Ajouter la possibilité de créer différents types de limites pour matérialiser les reculs en fonction des contraintes urbaines (ex. : reculs avant, latéraux, ou spécifiques aux réglementations locales).   Property Boundary Tool Enhancements 3D Visibility Make the Property Boundary tool visible in 3D, especially when creating sections or other views, to improve integration into the modeling workflow. Setback Typology Add the ability to create different types of boundaries to represent setbacks based on urban constraints (e.g., front, side, or regulation-specific setbacks). Show More

It would be nice to be able to select all visible rooms/areas at once and to turn visibility on/off for all of them at the same time, then only select the ones that need to be turned on. Basically, it would be really useful if Ctrl and Shift worked while selecting items in the list ((, Show More

In the REVIT UI, when using the "Autodesk Projects" to open a cloud based project created in Forma, it only pulls in a few of the parameters from the forma project. It would be nice if the forma project 'number' could also be pulled into the Autodesk browser window.     Show More

R25.4 Any detail line can be converted to a model line and the other way around. I propose to offer the same for text. Show More

The Browse For Folder flyout has a Favorites sidebar which is very thin and can obscure long folder names. Hovering ones mouse over the vertical line dividing Favorites from the explorer portion doesn't seem to let one drag the bar rightward. Show More

When selecting multiple objects and clicking the Filter button, it would be helpful to have a couple of upper level check boxes to select all detail items, or select all model items.   Or there could be visibility buttons to show/hide detail/model items.   Show More

Hi. We are working on a huge model with multiple worksets and links. The model is usually loading more then half an hour. While it loads, a popup window appears with information (see attached screenshot). There is no option - the user can not make any decision/influence  at this moment (like abort, choose some option or similar). So I click "close". Then after some time - it appears again. So I click "close" again. Then I open some other work to do while it opens, just to realise that a popup appeared again in the background some time ago.. So I stop doing anything else, and look at the still monitor, waiting to click "close" again at the unpredictible time when it appears. Is it just me, or is it really silly? How would I do it? I would make a popup window at any needed time when the user can infuelce: "Yes/No", "OK/Cancel" and similar. I would load the hole model, with one window after the model loads with multiple warnings and messages. After the (posible review) and confirmation - user can emidiately continue the work. This does not apply on popups that can be used for a decision "Yes/No", "OK/Cancel" and similar. Just on simple one option popups. Cheers, N Show More

the ability to set and modify the heights numerically in properties window, of the nodes between ends of a flex duct/pipe height especially if you're in plan view. You should be able to set heights and set the associated level(name) of each node Show More

Change Detail Level by Filter.   When creating a filter, allow a different detail level to be applied based on filter. Show More

Presently Revit will allow you add either the whole schedule to a sheet or, using the Z grip on a whole schedule, you may create a custom split layout that will allow your schedule to dodge other views on the sheet and control how much of the schedule appears in each subsequent segment.   This is a great function, but the problem is that once you decide where the splits are in one sheet, you can't reconfigure this in other sheets which share the same schedule. You can only place the whole schedule, or you can place each of the split segments that you created the first time. If you try readjusting on your new sheet, it will make the same changes to the previous sheet.   I propose that each instance of a schedule should be able to be custom split without affecting other instances of the same schedule that have been split differently. Show More

Revit currently only allows copy and paste between projects open in the same session. This makes it difficult to transfer elements when working with multiple Revit windows or versions. Other design software supports clipboard operations across sessions, and adding this to Revit would: Improve productivity for users working on several projects at once Remove the need for time-consuming workarounds like exporting groups or linking files Make Revit more consistent with user expectations from other design tools Please consider enabling copy/paste between separate Revit sessions to streamline workflows. Show More

Reference planes can be named. If they are, why not show them inside the project browser? Show More

Es wäre hilfreich, wenn man den Hintergrund sowohl von Text als auch Maßtexten auch in eine Farbe zuweisen könnte und nicht nur Transparent oder Undurchsichtig. Show More

As vezes queremos deixar o texto das cotas com uma cor e a linha de outra. Gostaria de poder configurar a cota já com cor de texto separado de cor de linha Show More

Raster printing is Not Great.  I think most of us want the following upgrades to raster printing:   1) Vector printing should handle more features.  Depth cueing and shadows are the two biggest pain points for most users.   2) When raster printing must be used, the embedded image should be higher quality.  Revit internal PDF export is the worst, creating fuzzy JPG embeds.  Printing to PDF through Bluebeam creates higher quality embedded images, but it's still a fuzzy mess.   3) Hybrid raster-vector printing.  Render as much as possible through vector graphics, then use a raster underlay for what cannot be done through vector.   4) Raster printing always prints WYSIWYG, but vector printing has quirky behavior occasionally.   Perhaps this will all be fixed (wiped away like a bad dream) when the new rendering engine is stable, mature, and ships to replace the current rendering engine.   ---   The below links are all threads about raster printing.  While these threads are not necessarily all about identical issues, and some threads contain nuances not captured in my summary above, these are all threads complaining about raster printing.  This thread exists to rally together all past votes and make the complaints easier to see.   https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/exporting-elevation-with-depth-cueing-enabled-as-vector-during/idi-p/14055525 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-printing-with-raster-underlay/idi-p/7565402 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-shadows-in-hidden-line-prints/idi-p/6330690 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/raster-printing-change-embedded-jpg-images-to-png-format/idi-p/11389094 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/add-to-raster-printing-message-information-on-the-use-of/idi-p/9207269 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/wysiwyg-amp-vector-printing/idi-p/7085229 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-option-for-export-to-pdf/idi-p/12764115 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/print-nwd-nwc-links-on-revit-sheets-as-vectors-pdf/idi-p/7908186 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-atop-raster-when-printing-with-coordination-model/idi-p/12084197 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/enable-pdf-export-with-black-lines-and-color-patterns-and-raster/idi-p/11762199 Show More

The buttons are too close   Show More

Currently in Revit, the paint tool applies continuously across an entire wall face, even when that wall intersects with other walls and creates separate rooms/spaces. Because of this, users must manually use Split Face/split wall every time adjacent rooms require different wall finishes or paint colors.   Make wall paint behavior "room-aware"    When a wall intersects another wall and creates distinct room boundaries or separated wall faces, Revit should automatically recognize these as independent paint regions. Painting one room side surface should stop at the room boundary/intersection instead of continuing through connected faces into adjacent rooms. This would significantly reduce repetitive modeling steps and improve workflow efficiency for architects and interior designers working on finish plans.    Example: If two bedrooms share one continuous wall but require different paint colors, painting Bedroom A's side should not carry through into Bedroom B's wall face. Revit should automatically stop the painted region at the room separation/intersection.   This small change would remove thousands of unnecessary split face operations across production projects. Show More