replace solid or hatch with block
Solids that have those characteristics are quite unlike that Block. Here, at the top is an insertion of the Block [at scale factors of 1 and rotation of 0, and it includes the arrowhead and the tail part, with the insertion point being the tip of the arrowhead]. Below it are two of your Solids that I made yellow for identification:
I'm having a really hard time imagining how you would want to replace those Solids with that Block. There might be some hope of determining the insertion point, if they all have the intended tip at the same entity data entry [those few that I checked do], and from there a rotation, and maybe even scale factors [the Solids are of varying sizes]. But the tail is going to make it nothing like what the Solids do as arrowheads with an Arc.
Likewise, here's the Block placed near a Hatch pattern that meets the qualifications [the brownish part]:
How would you want to replace that Hatch with that Block? Where should its insertion point go? What scales and rotation? There's no apparent [to me] relationship to anything else in the drawing.to suggest answers.
Can you post a before and after drawing? With only a few instances of the relevant pieces but showing all possible types, and with minimal other things just for context? We don't need all the other stuff, or the Layout.
@mruPRQUJ wrote:
.... Both of them scale is 1, rotation is 0. Insertion point for solid is the tip of the arrowhead, hatch insertion point is Center, ....
I think you need to think more about what you really want to do. According to that instruction, you will get results like these, in which I made the replacing Blocks green for identifiability:
It's especially weird at the "angular dimension" [which as really only 41°, and there is no Note 4 to refer to, if that would explain anything]. Those three at the right replaced the Hatch patterns that met your criteria -- what can they possibly mean, especially those with no leftover outline, that point to nothing?
And that's assuming that the "tip of the arrowhead" on the Solids is really always the same entity data entry [the ones I checked had it at the second of the corner definition points, i.e. DXF-code 11 entry, but I doubt you could guarantee that would always be the case].
@mruPRQUJ wrote:
.... Could you please provide the lisp and let me test it? thanks.
No -- I don't have a lisp. I did those replacements manually just to show the weirdness and to raise the question about what you really want to do. Even if you modify the Block, there simply must be something different about it than just "Both of them scale is 1, rotation is 0."
