The drawing clearly does not represent reality at all:

[The 40-unit space is clearly not only half the 80-unit space, nor is the 178-unit space more than twice the 80-unit space as it would be if it were "real."]
BUT IF you had them drawn at the actual spacings, you could just set the UCS origin at the left-end position, and use ORDINATE DIMENSIONS to get the cumulative-distance result you want: AND IF you also use actual linear DIMENSIONS for the distances between, then when you alter positions by for example Stretching, both the affected intermediate-spacing linear Dimensions and the cumulative-distance Ordinate Dimensions would correct themselves accordingly, without your needing to do anything about it. As you have it, if you change any positions, you would need to alter the Text for any spacings that changed, wipe out the now-invalid cumulative-distance numbers, and run the routine all over again to get new cumulative numbers.
Kent Cooper, AIA