urgen section acier pas logic

[DALHOUMI400]

salut

je calcul une sation de traitement d'eau par raobot mon probleme que la section des acier horizontale est grande au niveau superieur des voiles ce qui n'est pa logique car les force sont suposé nul dans cet zone

[Artur.Kosakowski]

Make sure you have the global averaging of forces switched off.

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

[DALHOUMI400]

i already diid that and it didn't solve the probleme

[Artur.Kosakowski]

Could you attach the file?

[DALHOUMI400]

how can i do that ?

[DALHOUMI400]

the file is big to be attachment shout i uploded in rapidshare

[DALHOUMI400]

http://www.4shared.com/file/QuO_2Qy1/rb_online.html

[Artur.Kosakowski]

Could you upload the file on another service please? I'm not able to download it. Thank you.

[DALHOUMI400]

http://www.mediafire.com/?g1e24j06jj6jwg8

[DALHOUMI400]

http://www.mediafire.com/?g1e24j06jj6jwg8

[DALHOUMI400]

http://rapidshare.com/files/2205634191/rb.rtd

[Artur.Kosakowski]

IMHO the distribution and values of reinforcement (actually in walls' top corners rather than at the top edges) correspond to the values and distribution of bending moments. At the first glance I can't see any issue with reinforcement calculations.

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

[DALHOUMI400]

i noticet that but i thiknk tha the liquid pressure must be zero at the top of element

somthing is wrong 

[DALHOUMI400]

can you please check the loads can be I made an error in the introduction of load

[Artur.Kosakowski]

This is how the structure works (I can't see any issue with loads). The beam you introduced increases the value of bending in the mid wall yet mind that actually the results in this location of the wall are within the real size of the beam so you may consider using the values from the surface elements below it instead.

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

[DALHOUMI400]

even if i remove the beam result dont change that much also in the top of the wall inside there no beam

[Artur.Kosakowski · Accepted solution]

The beam only increases the already large values but is not their cause. To illustrate the situation I made a separate wall with quasi similar boundary conditions which you can see on the picture I attached to the previous reply. IMHO it is simply how the structure behaves. I can't see any issue with the calculated results.

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

[DALHOUMI400]

thank you
if you dint mind can you help in the beam calculation i have some trouble

[Artur.Kosakowski]

Try to create another topic