Required reinforcement in slabs - funny results

Required reinforcement in slabs - funny results

mathias_peron
Collaborator Collaborator
805 Views
4 Replies
Message 1 of 5

Required reinforcement in slabs - funny results

mathias_peron
Collaborator
Collaborator

Hi, as I am using robot to design a reservoir, I get funny results for required reinforcement in slabs.

 

Robot doesn't seem to take into account cracking when performing the calculations. See below, for a 1000mm thick slab it gives me a max reinforcement equal to 703.59 mm2 at the peak. However when checking the forces at this particular point under worst SLS combination and I have a bending moment equal to 214.80 kN.m/m and almost no tension / compression. When doing the calcs by hand I get a way higher value!

 

Reinforcement required according to Robot

Reinforcement requiredReinforcement required

 

Axial force under SLS

Axial force under SLSAxial force under SLS

 

Bending under SLS

Bending moment under SLSBending moment under SLS

 

 

I think I have correctly set the parameters.

 

1.png2.png3.png4.png

 

Can someone help me please? Artur?

 

 

Regards,

 

Mathias.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
806 Views
4 Replies
Replies (4)
Message 2 of 5

Romanich
Mentor
Mentor

Hi @mathias_peron ,

Could you share the model and hand calculations?

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


0 Likes
Message 3 of 5

mathias_peron
Collaborator
Collaborator

Hi Romanich and thank you for your help.

 

Please find model and handcalcs here (too big for the forum) : https://we.tl/t-aoVJ89dKTq

 

 

This is for panel 15 at node 13996. Only the panels 'TH1000 (base)' seem to have this problem.

 

I hope you find the problem.

 

Regards,

 

Mathias.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 5

rsousa_
Advocate
Advocate
Accepted solution

Hi, 

 

did you notice that you don't have the minimum ammount of reinforcement as defined in EN1992-1-1? and that your moment is less that half of the cracking moment and maybe even at ULS your section isn't cracked at all?

But i can share my experience with cracking calculations in RSA:  i always do my checks by hand. Eurocode formulas are mainly for bending and have a lot of know problems (search Professor Beeby’s in structural concrete magazine) and you should see them as a good "quality" estimator. Putting this type of formula in a numerical algorithm is a nonsense in my humble opinion. But this is another subject that I'm sure other colleagues can share their opinions.

 

Regards

0 Likes
Message 5 of 5

mathias_peron
Collaborator
Collaborator

Thanks rsousa!

 

No I didn't notice the section wasn't cracked, thanks for making me aware about this. Yes I deactivated minimum reinforcement to check my crack widths hand calcs.

 

Thank you again 😉

 

Regards,

 

Mathias.

0 Likes