relationship between some of sheets and mesh problems

[vanvan11]

I want to ask why the diagram map of stresses in the sheet is discontinuous into pieces and it seems the relationship between some of sheets is not correct?

i try to join all the sides in one object but then become problem with mesh ... 

i think there is problem whit my panels mb?

can someone help me and if its possible tell me is my model correct

sry for me bad engl

eng. Ivan Georgiev

[vanvan11]

10x for help 

nice admins

very fast response

or u need a month or 2

if every time i w8 monts for respose better stop working whit this software

10x to my frends for the help 

[Rafacascudo · Accepted solution]

Try to set the "vertical" panels with similar local panel directions

[vanvan11]

10X FOR THE RESPONSE

really 10x

i will try but cant see big difference after that i mean in stress map

i accept that as solution

but pls can u tell me is that model correct i mean profiles have no offset and the sheet is on middle of profile but that make moment of interatia smaller from the real one

and one more if u can tell me is correct to design metal sheets whit robot couse i think its made for RC slabs whit armature.. i see the stress map is normal its loocks real but deformations in robot on thin metal sheets is bigger then real (is there something that i miss to design metal sheets something different from rc slabs?)

[Rafacascudo]

Robot will not design steel plates.

Offsets. Yes the inertia will be smaller.

2 options .

1- Create a custom section  with the correct (profile+plate) inertias and keep the beam without offsets. I prefer this way

2- set the bar offsets and be aware that you´ll get a lower bar bending moment but also axial normal loads on both bars and plate that will compensate for this lower bars bending moment.

Your DL1 load case is computing the generated self weight twice

[vanvan11]

Thanks for your help again
I appreciate the quick response
I'll try the first option that you suggest me
and on the sheets. to design them must comply with the maximum stress on them. I guess is not wrong but I think that overstates robot with deformities