Problems in maps presentation for this model

Problems in maps presentation for this model

mustafahesenow
Advisor Advisor
973 Views
5 Replies
Message 1 of 6

Problems in maps presentation for this model

mustafahesenow
Advisor
Advisor

Hi Guys,

 

I had problems with presenting vertical tension force in the core walls .

I had done the analysis with 2015,2016, and 2017 Robot version but still the same these forces not appear when I present them by result map.

The model is nonelinear analysis and its very complicated .

 

Bets Regards

 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-IpyO3EljSaUnhteFlHMy0wWDg

 



Mustafa Hesenow
Senior Structural Design Engineer/MZP
LinkedIn

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
974 Views
5 Replies
Replies (5)
Message 2 of 6

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Could you attach a screen capture that shows what to look at (which load case, which panel, what sort of results exactly etc.) and what you consider as incorrect please? Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 3 of 6

mustafahesenow
Advisor
Advisor

Dear Artur,

The model is attached in previous post.and this the replies on your Questions

1- for load Case is all cases no shown the vertical tension in the core walls.

2-For the panel: mostly the core walls and walls.

3-the stiffness of vertical elements and slabe is reduced.

4-P - Delta is considered in the analysis.

5- The most result not shown is Tension forces on the vertical walls and core walls .



Mustafa Hesenow
Senior Structural Design Engineer/MZP
LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 4 of 6

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

Thank you for the pictures as they clarified the situation for me. Looking at them I assume that you expect to see some in-plane tension forces calculated according to Wood and Armer (W&A) method in the direction of the global Z axis. When I checked the components I think that the zero values are actually correct.

 

If you display Nxx forces for the panel you indicated for case 13 you can see that all the values are negative (compression). If you look at Nxy you can see that there is some tension but smaller than the Nxx compression in the same locations. As W&A Nxx force is just the sum of these components you will have negative values which means zeros for axial force for tension reinforcement calculations. You can see this if you check the table results as well. In addition when you check the Nxx W&A for compression you can see that the values (which include Nxy) are larger than these for Nxx.

 

I hope this helps.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

 

 



Artur Kosakowski
Message 5 of 6

mustafahesenow
Advisor
Advisor

Dear Artur,

Thanks for your feedback. I have another probelems that all of these walls which is not have vertical temnsion forces the required reinforcement for this walls show as Zero for vertical reinforcement .

Thanks



Mustafa Hesenow
Senior Structural Design Engineer/MZP
LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 6 of 6

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

Dear Mustafa,

 

Looking at the results it seems that for the 400 mm thick wall in-plane compression force is small enough to be transferred via concrete resistance only and as you demanded minimal reinforcement for As > 0 there is no map of the required reinforcement displayed as it is not needed. 

 

When I set the minimal reinforcement to be assumed for the whole panel and then after calculating the reinforcement again the map was displayed as shown on the attached picture.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes